Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25720332›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2015

Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation and microcirculation in cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an IABP-SHOCK II substudy.

Christian Jung, Georg Fuernau, Suzanne de Waha, Ingo Eitel, Steffen Desch, Gerhard Schuler, Hans R Figulla, Holger Thiele

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Toward a Broader Characterization of Macro- and Microcirculatory Uncoupling in Cardiogenic Shock.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Vasopressors for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Hypoxic hepatitis in cardiogenic shock : Incidence, laboratory detection and prognosis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Article
  18. Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with mild elevations of cardiac troponin.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
  19. Incidence, laboratory detection and prognostic relevance of hypoxic hepatitis in cardiogenic shock.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
  20. IABP plus ECMO-Is one and one more than two?Journal of thoracic disease · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christian JungClinic of Internal Medicine I, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany, christian.jung@med.uni-jena.de.
Georg Fuernau
Suzanne de Waha
Ingo Eitel
Steffen Desch
Gerhard Schuler
Hans R Figulla
Holger Thiele
Leipzig Heart Institute · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study sought to evaluate the influence of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation on the microcirculation in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction.

backgroundIn patients with shock profound alterations of the microcirculation have been observed and their clinical relevance has been described. Different treatment strategies exist to improve microvascular perfusion in patients with CS; however, the role of IABP treatment is not clearly defined.

methodsA predefined substudy of the randomized Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II trial (IABP-SHOCK II) investigated the sublingual microcirculation using a sidestream darkfield intravital microscope on days 1, 2 and 4 after the onset of shock. Perfused capillary (<20 µm, PCD) and vessel densities (<100 µm, PVD), total capillary (TCD) and vessel (TVD) densities were determined. In addition, the proportion of perfused vessels was assessed.

resultsForty-one patients were included in this substudy (n = 24 with IABP support vs. n = 17 without IABP support). No significant differences between treatment with or without IABP regarding PCD, PVD, TCD, TVD and the proportion of perfused vessels were evident on all three timepoints (p = n.s. for all). Microvascular perfusion showed inverse correlation with subsequent serum lactate levels (-0.366; p = 0.02) without being significantly correlated with lactate levels at the timepoint of the microcirculatory investigation. In Kaplan-Meier analysis microcirculatory parameters showed significant discrimination of prediction for time to death (p < 0.05 for all).

conclusionsIn patients with CS, there is no effect of IABP treatment on microvascular perfusion. Parameters of the microcirculation might be helpful to identify high risk patients.

Indexed as

Intra-Aortic Balloon PumpingMicrocirculationAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCapillariesFemaleGermanyHumansIntravital MicroscopyLactic AcidMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaMyocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkersLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID25720332
OpenAlexW2005661652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.