Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25719834›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and its utilisation for the management of cancer patients in early clinical trials.

R Kumar, E Geuna, V Michalarea, M Guardascione, U Naumann, D Lorente, S B Kaye, J S de Bono

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Evaluation of peripheral blood inflammatory biomarkers in sickle cell disease with and without retinopathy.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R KumarThe Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5PT, UK.
E GeunaThe Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5PT, UK.
V MichalareaThe Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5PT, UK.
M GuardascioneThe Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5PT, UK.
U NaumannThe Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5NG, UK.
D LorenteThe Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5PT, UK.
S B KayeThe Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5PT, UK.
J S de BonoThe Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, London SM2 5PT, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammation is critical to the pathogenesis and progression of cancer, with a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) associated with poor prognosis. The utility of studying NLR in early clinical trials is unknown.

methodsThis retrospective study evaluated 1300 patients treated in phase 1 clinical trials between July 2004 and February 2014 at the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH), UK. Data were collected on patient characteristics and baseline laboratory parameters.

resultsThe test cohort recruited 300 patients; 53% were female, 35% ECOG 0 and 64% ECOG 1. RMH score was 0-1 in 66% and 2-3 in 34%. The median NLR was 3.08 (IQR 2.06-4.49). Median OS for the NLR quartiles was 10.5 months for quartile-1, 10.3 months for quartile-2, 7.9 months for quartile-3 and 6.5 months for quartile-4 (P<0.0001). Univariate analysis identified RMH score (HR=0.55, P<0.0001), ECOG (HR=0.62, P=0.002) and neutrophils (HR=0.65, P=0.003) to be associated with OS. In multivariate analysis, adjusting for RMH score, ECOG, neutrophils and tumour type, NLR remained significantly associated with OS (P=0.002), with no association with therapeutic steroid use. These results were validated in a further 1000 cancer patients. In the validation cohort, NLR was able to discriminate for OS (P=0.004), as was the RMH score. This was further improved on in the RMH score+NLR50 and RMH score+Log10NLR models, with an optimal NLR cutoff of 3.0.

conclusionsNLR is a validated independent prognostic factor for OS in patients treated in phase 1 trials. Combining the NLR with the RMH score improves the discriminating ability for OS.

Indexed as

AgedClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansInflammationLymphocytesMaleNeoplasmsNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25719834
PMCPMC4385959
OpenAlexW2089783760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.