Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25719831›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Protein shedding in urothelial bladder cancer: prognostic implications of soluble urinary EGFR and EpCAM.

R T Bryan, H L Regan, S J Pirrie, A J Devall, K K Cheng, M P Zeegers, N D James, M A Knowles, D G Ward

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Role of tyrosine kinases in bladder cancer progression: an overview.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2020
    Review
  8. Shedding light on the EpCAM: An overview.Journal of cellular physiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Bladder Cancer.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Use ofProteomes · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R T BryanSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
H L ReganSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
S J PirrieSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
A J DevallSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
K K ChengSchool of Population and Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
M P Zeegers1] School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK [2] Department of Complex Genetics, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
N D JamesClinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
M A KnowlesSection of Experimental Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
D G WardSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter biomarkers must be found to develop clinically useful urine tests for bladder cancer. Proteomics can be used to identify the proteins released by cancer cell lines and generate candidate markers for developing such tests.

methodsWe used shotgun proteomics to identify proteins released into culture media by eight bladder cancer cell lines. These data were compared with protein expression data from the Human Protein Atlas. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was identified as a candidate biomarker and measured by ELISA in urine from 60 noncancer control subjects and from 436 patients with bladder cancer and long-term clinical follow-up.

resultsBladder cancer cell lines shed soluble EGFR ectodomain. Soluble EGFR is also detectable in urine and is highly elevated in some patients with high-grade bladder cancer. Urinary EGFR is an independent indicator of poor bladder cancer-specific survival with a hazard ratio of 2.89 (95% CI 1.81-4.62, P<0.001). In multivariable models including both urinary EGFR and EpCAM, both biomarkers are predictive of bladder cancer-specific survival and have prognostic value over and above that provided by standard clinical observations.

conclusionsMeasuring urinary EGFR and EpCAM may represent a simple and useful approach for fast-tracking the investigation and treatment of patients with the most aggressive bladder cancers.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMalePrognosisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell Adhesion MoleculesEGFR protein, humanEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID25719831
PMCPMC4366887
OpenAlexW1970908071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.