Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25719497›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2015

Time-dependent pretreatment with bevacuzimab increases tumor specific uptake of cetuximab in preclinical oral cavity cancer studies.

Thomas K Chung, Jason Warram, Kristine E Day, Yolanda Hartman, Eben L Rosenthal

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas K Chunga Division of Otolaryngology; Department of Surgery; University of Alabama at Birmingham ; Birmingham , AL USA.
Jason Warram
Kristine E Day
Yolanda Hartman
Eben L Rosenthal
St. Vincent's Birmingham · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Research Training Program in Surgical OncologyT32CA091078 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KENNEDY, GREGORY DEAN · 2002 to 2017
$4.8M
Optical imaging of primary and regional melanoma to guide surgical resectionR21CA179171 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ROSENTHAL, EBEN L. · 2013 to 2014
$347k
NCI NIH HHS R21CA179171NCI NIH HHS T32CA091078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadequate delivery of therapeutics into tumors has been suggested as a reason for poor response. We hypothesize that bevacizumab, an antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), can improve cetuximab uptake in squamous cell carcinoma tumors. Athymic nude mice were implanted with OSC19 and SCC1 human cancer lines in a subcutaneous flank model. Mice were imaged daily for 14 days after intravenous tail vein injections of the following groups: IgG-IRDye800 (Control), cetuximab-IRDye800 (CTX800 Only), bevacizumab-IRDye800 (BVZ800 Only), cetuximab-IRDye800 + bevacuzimuab-IRDye800 (Simultaneous), and unlabeled bevacizumab followed by cetuximab-IRDye800 3 days later (Neoadjuvant). Within single-agent groups, the CTX800 Only tumor-specific uptake (TSU) was significantly higher than BVZ800 Only at Day 13 (TSU 8.6 vs 2.8, P < 0.001). The Simultaneous treatment with BVZ800 and CTX800 demonstrated no increase in antibody delivery. However, administration of unlabeled bevacizumab 3 days prior to CTX800 (Neoadjuvant group) resulted in significantly higher tumor specific delivery than administration of both antibodies at the same time (11.8 vs Simultaneous 5.0, P < 0.001). This difference can be attributed to a slower decline in tumor fluorescence intensity (-6.8% vs. Simultaneous -11.5% per day, respectively). Structural changes in pericyte coverage and functional vessel changes demonstrating decreased proliferation and tumor growth corroborate these fluorescence results. Although simultaneous administration of bevacizumab with cetuximab failed to increase antibody delivery to the tumor, pretreatment with bevacizumab improved TSU reflecting an increase in tumor-specific uptake of cetuximab as a result of vessel normalization.

Indexed as

AnimalsBevacizumabCell Line, TumorCetuximabDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceMice, NudeMouth NeoplasmsBevacizumabCetuximabanti-angiogenesis therapybevacuzimab-IRDye800; EPRcetuximab-IRDye800; BVZ800EGFRendothelial growth factor receptor; VEGFenhanced permeability and retention.head and neck cancerhead and neck squamous cell carcinoma; TSUhuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HNSCCmonoclonal antibody therapynear-infrared fluorescenceoptical imagingtherapeutic deliverytumor specific uptake; CTX800vascular endothelial growth factor; HER2vessel normalization

Identifiers

PMID25719497
PMCPMC4623551
OpenAlexW1576919975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.