Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25719406›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Quantifying two-dimensional filamentous and invasive growth spatial patterns in yeast colonies.

Benjamin J Binder, Joanna F Sundstrom, Jennifer M Gardner, Vladimir Jiranek, Stephen G Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantification ofJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrative analysis of yeast colony growth.Communications biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benjamin J BinderSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Joanna F SundstromSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jennifer M GardnerSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Vladimir JiranekSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stephen G OliverCambridge Systems Biology Centre and Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The top-view, two-dimensional spatial patterning of non-uniform growth in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast colony is considered. Experimental images are processed to obtain data sets that provide spatial information on the cell-area that is occupied by the colony. A method is developed that allows for the analysis of the spatial distribution with three metrics. The growth of the colony is quantified in both the radial direction from the centre of the colony and in the angular direction in a prescribed outer region of the colony. It is shown that during the period of 100-200 hours from the start of the growth of the colony there is an increasing amount of non-uniform growth. The statistical framework outlined in this work provides a platform for comparative quantitative assays of strain-specific mechanisms, with potential implementation in inferencing algorithms used for parameter-rate estimation.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalComputational BiologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID25719406
PMCPMC4342342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.