Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25717471›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015

On the relative relevance of subject-specific geometries and degeneration-specific mechanical properties for the study of cell death in human intervertebral disk models.

Andrea Malandrino, José M Pozo, Isaac Castro-Mateos, Alejandro F Frangi, Marc M van Rijsbergen, Keita Ito, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Tien Tuan Dao, Marie-Christine Ho Ba Tho, Jérôme Noailly

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A finite element study of the effect of cross-link stabilisation in a lumbar spine tumour model.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Computational Challenges in Tissue Engineering for the Spine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Moderately degenerated lumbar motion segments: Are they truly unstable?Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Intervertebral disc classification by its degree of degeneration from T2-weighted magnetic resonance images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrea MalandrinoBiomechanics and Mechanobiology, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia , Barcelona , Spain.
José M PozoCenter for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield , Sheffield , UK.
Isaac Castro-MateosCenter for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield , Sheffield , UK.
Alejandro F FrangiCenter for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield , Sheffield , UK.
Marc M van RijsbergenOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven , Netherlands.
Keita ItoOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology , Eindhoven , Netherlands.
Hans-Joachim WilkeCenter of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, Institute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, University of Ulm , Ulm , Germany.
Tien Tuan DaoUTC CNRS UMR 7338, Biomécanique et Biongénierie (BMBI), Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.
Marie-Christine Ho Ba ThoUTC CNRS UMR 7338, Biomécanique et Biongénierie (BMBI), Université de Technologie de Compiègne , Compiègne , France.
Jérôme NoaillyBiomechanics and Mechanobiology, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia , Barcelona , Spain.
University of Sheffield · GBEindhoven University of Technology · NLInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversität Ulm · DEUniversité de Technologie de Compiègne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capturing patient- or condition-specific intervertebral disk (IVD) properties in finite element models is outmost important in order to explore how biomechanical and biophysical processes may interact in spine diseases. However, disk degenerative changes are often modeled through equations similar to those employed for healthy organs, which might not be valid. As for the simulated effects of degenerative changes, they likely depend on specific disk geometries. Accordingly, we explored the ability of continuum tissue models to simulate disk degenerative changes. We further used the results in order to assess the interplay between these simulated changes and particular IVD morphologies, in relation to disk cell nutrition, a potentially important factor in disk tissue regulation. A protocol to derive patient-specific computational models from clinical images was applied to different spine specimens. In vitro, IVD creep tests were used to optimize poro-hyperelastic input material parameters in these models, in function of the IVD degeneration grade. The use of condition-specific tissue model parameters in the specimen-specific geometrical models was validated against independent kinematic measurements in vitro. Then, models were coupled to a transport-cell viability model in order to assess the respective effects of tissue degeneration and disk geometry on cell viability. While classic disk poro-mechanical models failed in representing known degenerative changes, additional simulation of tissue damage allowed model validation and gave degeneration-dependent material properties related to osmotic pressure and water loss, and to increased fibrosis. Surprisingly, nutrition-induced cell death was independent of the grade-dependent material properties, but was favored by increased diffusion distances in large IVDs. Our results suggest that in situ geometrical screening of IVD morphology might help to anticipate particular mechanisms of disk degeneration.

Indexed as

damage modeldisk cell nutritionfinite element modelingintervertebral disk degenerationLumbar spineporoelasticitysubject-specific modeling

Identifiers

PMID25717471
PMCPMC4324300
OpenAlexW2077452338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.