ArticleJournal of caring sciences2014
The Relationship between Cognitive Appraisal and Adherence to Medical Regimens in Type 2 Diabetic Patients.
Article in Journal of caring sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03878186 (Efficacy Of A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy To Decrease Threat Appraisal In Participants With HIV Infection Initiating Antiretroviral Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy Of A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy To Decrease Threat Appraisal In Participants With HIV Infection Initiating Antiretroviral Treatment: Clinical Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Socio-Clinical Correlations With Threat Perception and Self-Efficacy in People With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025Article
- Effective Strategies for Physical Activity Adherence in Heart Failure Patients: An Umbrella Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Review
- Experiences of what influences physical activity adherence in Iranian patients with heart failure: A qualitative study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- The relationship between cognitive perception of self-concept and coping styles in heart failure patients.Nursing open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNon-adherence to medical regimen has remained a challenge to the medical profession as well as to social sciences. To achieve positive results, the factors negatively impacting patient adherence to medical regimens (i.e., diet, drug and exercise regimen) must be scrutinized in detail. The objective of this research was to explore the relationship between cognitive appraisal and adherence to medical regimens in type 2 diabetic patients.
methodsIn this correlational study, 218 type 2 diabetes patients receiving treatment at the Diabetes Clinic affiliated with Gonabad University of Medical Sciences were selected through non-probability (convenience) sampling from April 2012 to May 2013. Two valid and reliable questionnaires of cognitive appraisal and adherence to medical regimens were completed by each patient. The data were analyzed using SPSS ver 13.
resultsA relationship was observed between perceived cognitive and adherence to some aspects of medical regimen. Also direct relationship was observedbetween perceived cognitive in form challenge and adherence of diet in patients with diabetes. There was no statistically significant relationship between aspects of cognitive appraisal and adherence to the drug regimen.
conclusionThe results suggest that interventions undertaken to improve adherence to medical regimen, particularly to drug regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes, should be focused on enriching cognitive appraisal. Nurses need to help patients perceive diabetes as less of a threat and in fact should empower them, so as to look upon it as more of a challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.