Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25717307›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

A matter of time: improvement of visual temporal processing during training-induced restoration of light detection performance.

Dorothe A Poggel, Bernhard Treutwein, Bernhard A Sabel, Hans Strasburger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dorothe A PoggelGeneration Research Program, Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilian University , Bad Tölz, Germany ; Hanse-Wissenschaftskolleg Institute for Advanced Study, Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences , Delmenhorst, Germany ; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Georg-August University , Göttingen, Germany.
Bernhard TreutweinIuK, Ludwig-Maximilian University , Munich, Germany.
Bernhard A SabelInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University , Magdeburg, Germany.
Hans StrasburgerGeneration Research Program, Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilian University , Bad Tölz, Germany ; Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Georg-August University , Göttingen, Germany ; Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University , Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEInstitute for Advanced Study · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The issue of how basic sensory and temporal processing are related is still unresolved. We studied temporal processing, as assessed by simple visual reaction times (RT) and double-pulse resolution (DPR), in patients with partial vision loss after visual pathway lesions and investigated whether vision restoration training (VRT), a training program designed to improve light detection performance, would also affect temporal processing. Perimetric and campimetric visual field tests as well as maps of DPR thresholds and RT were acquired before and after a 3 months training period with VRT. Patient performance was compared to that of age-matched healthy subjects. Intact visual field size increased during training. Averaged across the entire visual field, DPR remained constant while RT improved slightly. However, in transition zones between the blind and intact areas (areas of residual vision) where patients had shown between 20 and 80% of stimulus detection probability in pre-training visual field tests, both DPR and RT improved markedly. The magnitude of improvement depended on the defect depth (or degree of intactness) of the respective region at baseline. Inter-individual training outcome variability was very high, with some patients showing little change and others showing performance approaching that of healthy controls. Training-induced improvement of light detection in patients with visual field loss thus generalized to dynamic visual functions. The findings suggest that similar neural mechanisms may underlie the impairment and subsequent training-induced functional recovery of both light detection and temporal processing.

Indexed as

blindnessplasticityreaction timetemporal resolutiontopographytrainingvisual fieldvisual restoration

Identifiers

PMID25717307
PMCPMC4324065
OpenAlexW2002603781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.