ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015
Repeat hepatic resection in patients with colorectal liver metastases.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Open Liver Resection: A Randomised Clinical Trial.World journal of surgery · 2021Trial
- Feasibility of Right Upper Transversal Hepatectomy in the Absence of an Inferior Right Hepatic Vein: New Insights regarding This Complex Procedure.Case reports in surgery · 2021Article
- Microwave Ablation in the Proximity of Surgical Clips: Is there a Safety Issue?Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2020Article
- Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
- Oncological outcomes of repeat metastasectomy for recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. A case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Article
- Salvage RFA in patients with intrahepatic recurrence after major hepatic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases: mid-term outcome.European radiology · 2020Observational
- Novel patient risk factors and validation of a difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Repeat hepatectomy for recurred colorectal liver metastasis: is it justified?Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2019Article
- Repeat hepatectomy with systemic chemotherapy might improve survival of recurrent liver metastasis from colorectal cancer-a retrospective observational study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2019Observational
- Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases.World journal of clinical cases · 2018Review
- Surgical salvage of recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases: incidence and outcomes.Hepatic oncology · 2017Article
- Recurrence after hepatic resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis -Review article-.Journal of medicine and life · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the survival outcomes of secondary hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
methodsFrom October 1994 to December 2009, patients with CRLM who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent were investigated. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who underwent primary hepatectomy (Group 1) and those who underwent secondary hepatectomy for recurrent CRLM (Group 2).
resultsSurvival and prognostic factors were analyzed. A total of 461 patients were included: 406 patients in Group 1 and 55 patients in Group 2. After a median 39-mo (range, 3-195 mo) follow-up, there was a significant difference between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of disease-free survival (P=0.029) although there was no significant difference in overall survival (P=0.206). Secondary hepatectomy was less effective in patients with multiple recurrent CRLM than primary hepatectomy for initial CRLM (P=0.008). Multiple CRLM and radiofrequency ablation therapy were poor prognostic factors of secondary hepatectomy in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P=0.006, P=0.004, respectively).
conclusionSecondary hepatectomy for single recurrent CRLM is as effective as primary surgical treatment for single recurrent CRLM. However, secondary hepatectomy for multiple recurrent CRLM is less effective than that for single recurrent CRLM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.