Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25717198›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

A new method to improve network topological similarity search: applied to fold recognition.

John Lhota, Ruth Hauptman, Thomas Hart, Clara Ng, Lei Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The language of the protein universe.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John LhotaHunter College High School, New York, NY 10128, U.S.A., Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, U.S.A., Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, The City University of New York New York, NY 10065, U.S.A. and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.
Ruth HauptmanHunter College High School, New York, NY 10128, U.S.A., Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, U.S.A., Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, The City University of New York New York, NY 10065, U.S.A. and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.
Thomas HartHunter College High School, New York, NY 10128, U.S.A., Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, U.S.A., Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, The City University of New York New York, NY 10065, U.S.A. and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.
Clara NgHunter College High School, New York, NY 10128, U.S.A., Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, U.S.A., Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, The City University of New York New York, NY 10065, U.S.A. and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.
Lei XieHunter College High School, New York, NY 10128, U.S.A., Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, U.S.A., Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, The City University of New York New York, NY 10065, U.S.A. and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A. Hunter College High School, New York, NY 10128, U.S.A., Department of Computer Science, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, U.S.A., Department of Biological Sciences, Hunter College, The City University of New York New York, NY 10065, U.S.A. and The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY 10016, U.S.A.

Funding

Drug discovery by integrating chemical genomics and structural systems biologyR01LM011986 · NLM · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI BRINKMAN, FIONA, BURLEY, STEPHEN K · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NLM NIH HHS LM011986NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSimilarity search is the foundation of bioinformatics. It plays a key role in establishing structural, functional and evolutionary relationships between biological sequences. Although the power of the similarity search has increased steadily in recent years, a high percentage of sequences remain uncharacterized in the protein universe. Thus, new similarity search strategies are needed to efficiently and reliably infer the structure and function of new sequences. The existing paradigm for studying protein sequence, structure, function and evolution has been established based on the assumption that the protein universe is discrete and hierarchical. Cumulative evidence suggests that the protein universe is continuous. As a result, conventional sequence homology search methods may be not able to detect novel structural, functional and evolutionary relationships between proteins from weak and noisy sequence signals. To overcome the limitations in existing similarity search methods, we propose a new algorithmic framework-Enrichment of Network Topological Similarity (ENTS)-to improve the performance of large scale similarity searches in bioinformatics.

resultsWe apply ENTS to a challenging unsolved problem: protein fold recognition. Our rigorous benchmark studies demonstrate that ENTS considerably outperforms state-of-the-art methods. As the concept of ENTS can be applied to any similarity metric, it may provide a general framework for similarity search on any set of biological entities, given their representation as a network. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code freely available upon request CONTACT: : lxie@iscb.org.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksPattern Recognition, AutomatedProtein FoldingComputational BiologyHumansProteinsSequence AlignmentSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID25717198
PMCPMC4481851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.