Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25717151›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2015

Genetic mapping of natural variation in schooling tendency in the threespine stickleback.

Anna K Greenwood, Reza Ardekani, Shaugnessy R McCann, Matthew E Dubin, Amy Sullivan, Seth Bensussen, Simon Tavaré, Catherine L Peichel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social environment determines the effect of boldness and activity on survival.Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2019
    Article
  9. TheeLife · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The genetic and molecular architecture of phenotypic diversity in sticklebacks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement.The Journal of experimental biology · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna K GreenwoodDivisions of Basic Sciences and Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109.
Reza ArdekaniProgram in Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Shaugnessy R McCannDivisions of Basic Sciences and Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109.
Matthew E DubinDivisions of Basic Sciences and Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109.
Amy SullivanDivisions of Basic Sciences and Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109.
Seth BensussenDivisions of Basic Sciences and Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109.
Simon TavaréProgram in Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089.
Catherine L PeichelDivisions of Basic Sciences and Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109 cpeichel@fhcrc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-8944

Funding

Implications of haplotype structure in the human genomeP50HG002790 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TAVARE, SIMON · 2003 to 2013
$29.9M
Cancer Research UK 20406NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is a heritable basis for many animal behaviors, the genetic architecture of behavioral variation in natural populations remains mostly unknown, particularly in vertebrates. We sought to identify the genetic basis for social affiliation in two populations of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) that differ in their propensity to school. Marine sticklebacks from Japan school strongly whereas benthic sticklebacks from a lake in Canada are more solitary. Here, we expanded on our previous efforts to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) for differences in schooling tendency. We tested fish multiple times in two assays that test different aspects of schooling tendency: 1) the model school assay, which presents fish with a school of eight model sticklebacks; and 2) the choice assay, in which fish are given a choice between the model school and a stationary artificial plant. We found low-to-moderate levels of repeatability, ranging from 0.1 to 0.5, in schooling phenotypes. To identify the genomic regions that contribute to differences in schooling tendency, we used QTL mapping in two types of crosses: benthic × marine backcrosses and an F2 intercross. We found two QTL for time spent with the school in the model school assay, and one QTL for number of approaches to the school in the choice assay. These QTL were on three different linkage groups, not previously linked to behavioral differences in sticklebacks. Our results highlight the importance of using multiple crosses and robust behavioral assays to uncover the genetic basis of behavioral variation in natural populations.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalChromosome MappingGenetic VariationAnimalsBiological EvolutionCrosses, GeneticFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetics, PopulationMalePhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of ResultsSmegmamorphaevolutionfishquantitative trait locus (QTL)repeatabilitysocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID25717151
PMCPMC4426364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.