Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25716776›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2015

Dopaminergic Modulation of Lateral Amygdala Neuronal Activity: Differential D1 and D2 Receptor Effects on Thalamic and Cortical Afferent Inputs.

Chun-Hui Chang, Anthony A Grace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Input-specific contributions to valence processing in the amygdala.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neuronal correlates of depression.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chun-Hui ChangDepartments of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 (Drs Chang and Grace). changch@pitt.edu.
Anthony A GraceDepartments of Neuroscience, Psychiatry, and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 (Drs Chang and Grace).

Funding

Circuit-based Study of Depression/Anhedonia in RatsR01MH101180 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GRACE, ANTHONY A · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS MH191180NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn auditory fear conditioning, the lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) integrates a conditioned stimulus (CS) from the auditory thalamus (MGN) and the auditory association cortex (Te3) with an aversive unconditioned stimulus. The thalamic input provides a basic version of the CS, while the cortical input provides a processed representation of the stimulus. Dopamine (DA) is released in the LA under heightened arousal during the presentation of the CS.

methodsIn this study we examined how D1 or D2 receptor activation affects LA afferent-driven neuronal firing using in vivo extracellular single-unit recordings with local micro-iontophoretic drug application in anesthetized rats. LA neurons that were responsive (~50%) to electrical stimulation in either the MGN or the Te3 were tested by iontophoresis of either the D1 agonist, SKF38393, or the D2 agonist, quinpirole.

resultsWe found that most of the LA projection neurons exhibited either facilitatory or attenuating effects (changes in evoked probability >15% relative to baseline) on afferent input by activation of D1 or D2 receptors. In general, it required significantly higher stimulation current to evoke ~50% baseline responses to the cortical input. Activation of the D1 receptor showed no difference in modulation between the thalamic or cortical pathways. On the other hand, activation of the D2 receptor had a stronger inhibitory modulation of the cortical pathway, but a stronger excitatory modulation of the thalamic pathway.

conclusionsOur results suggest that there is a shift in balance favoring the thalamic pathway in response to DA acting via the D2 receptor.

Indexed as

2,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepineAmygdalaAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysDopamineDopamine AgonistsElectric StimulationEvoked PotentialsMaleMicroelectrodesNeuronsQuinpiroleRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D22,3,4,5-Tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepineDopamineDopamine AgonistsQuinpiroleReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2amygdalaauditory cortexauditory thalamusD1 receptorD2 receptordopamine

Identifiers

PMID25716776
PMCPMC4571626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.