Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25716544›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2015

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic properties of oral DEBIO1143 (AT-406) in patients with advanced cancer: results of a first-in-man study.

Herbert I Hurwitz, David C Smith, Henry C Pitot, Jeffrey M Brill, Rashmi Chugh, Elisabeth Rouits, Joseph Rubin, John Strickler, Gregoire Vuagniaux, J Mel Sorensen and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The cross talk of ubiquitination and chemotherapy tolerance in colorectal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Herbert I HurwitzDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC 3052, Durham, NC, 27710, USA, herbert.hurwitz@duke.edu.
David C Smith
Henry C Pitot
Jeffrey M Brill
Rashmi Chugh
Elisabeth Rouits
Joseph Rubin
John Strickler
Gregoire Vuagniaux
J Mel Sorensen
Claudio Zanna

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and antitumor activity of DEBIO1143, an antagonist of inhibitor apoptosis proteins.

methodsThis first-in-man study in patients with advanced cancer used an accelerated dose titration design. DEBIO1143 was given orally once daily on days 1-5 every 2 or 3 weeks until disease progressed or patients dropped out. The starting dose of 5 mg was escalated by 100% in single patients until related grade 2 toxicity occurred. This triggered expansion to cohorts of three and subsequently six patients and reduction in dose increments to 50%. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was exceeded when any two patients within the same cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). On days 1 and 5, PK and PD samples were taken.

resultsThirty-one patients received doses from 5 to 900 mg. Only one DLT was reported at 180 mg. No MTD was found. Most common adverse drug reactions were fatigue (26%), nausea (23%), and vomiting (13%). Average t max and T 1/2 was about 1 and 6 h, respectively. Exposure increased proportionally with doses from 80 to 900 mg, without accumulation over 5 days. Plasma CCL2 increased at 3-6 h postdose and epithelial apoptosis marker M30 on day 5; cIAP-1 levels in PBMCs decreased at all doses >80 mg. Five patients (17%) had stable disease as the best treatment response.

conclusionDEBIO1143 was well tolerated at doses up to 900 mg and elicited PD effects at doses greater 80 mg. Limited antitumor activity may suggest development rather as adjunct treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisAzocinesBenzhydryl CompoundsChemokine CCL2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsAzocinesBenzhydryl CompoundsCCL2 protein, humanChemokine CCL2Inhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsN-benzhydryl-5-(2-(methylamino)propanamido)-3-(3-methylbutanoyl)-6-oxodecahydropyrrolo(1,2-a)(1,5)diazocine-8-carboxamide

Identifiers

PMID25716544
PMCPMC4365270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.