ReviewTransgenic research2015
Genetic basis and detection of unintended effects in genetically modified crop plants.
Review in Transgenic research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unintended effects of exogenous DNA integration in transgenic papaya analyzed at DNA and transcriptional levels.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Targeting eIF4A with RNA Aptamers Enhances Salt Stress Tolerance in Rice Through Modulation of Translation Initiation.Rice (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Deciphering the complex molecular architecture of the genetically modified soybean FG72 through paired-end whole genome sequencing.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A visible seedling-stage screening system for the Brassica napus hybrid breeding by a novel hypocotyl length-regulated gene BnHL.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Acclimation of functional traits leads to biomass increases in leafy green species grown in aquaponics.AoB PLANTS · 2025Article
- MicroRNA396 negatively regulates shoot regeneration in tomato.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Application of next-generation sequencing in the detection of transgenic crop.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Compositional and Morphological Analysis of Salt Stress Tolerant Mannitol-1-phosphate Dehydrogenase (mtlD)-Transgenic Potato Plants.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- CRISPR Variants for Gene Editing in Plants: Biosafety Risks and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Blueprint for non-transgenic edited plants.Nature plants · 2023Article
- Impact of Intron and Retransformation on Transgene Expression in Leaf and Fruit Tissues of Field-Grown Pear Trees.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Volunteer Plants' Occurrence and the Environmental Adaptability of Genetically Modified Fodder Corn upon Unintentional Release into the Environment.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Phenotypic Performance, Molecular Diversity, and Proteomics in Transgenic Rice.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Green Revolution to Gene Revolution: Technological Advances in Agriculture to Feed the World.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Sustainable use of CRISPR/Cas in fish aquaculture: the biosafety perspective.Transgenic research · 2022Review
- Are Physicochemical Properties Shaping the Allergenic Potency of Plant Allergens?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- Stability of Transgene Inheritance in Progeny of Field-Grown Pear Trees over a 7-Year Period.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Mature Transgenic Poplar Expressing the Transcription FactorFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- RNA Interference-Based Genetic Engineering Maize Resistant toFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In January 2014, an international meeting sponsored by the International Life Sciences Institute/Health and Environmental Sciences Institute and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency titled "Genetic Basis of Unintended Effects in Modified Plants" was held in Ottawa, Canada, bringing together over 75 scientists from academia, government, and the agro-biotech industry. The objectives of the meeting were to explore current knowledge and identify areas requiring further study on unintended effects in plants and to discuss how this information can inform and improve genetically modified (GM) crop risk assessments. The meeting featured presentations on the molecular basis of plant genome variability in general, unintended changes at the molecular and phenotypic levels, and the development and use of hypothesis-driven evaluations of unintended effects in assessing conventional and GM crops. The development and role of emerging "omics" technologies in the assessment of unintended effects was also discussed. Several themes recurred in a number of talks; for example, a common observation was that no system for genetic modification, including conventional methods of plant breeding, is without unintended effects. Another common observation was that "unintended" does not necessarily mean "harmful". This paper summarizes key points from the information presented at the meeting to provide readers with current viewpoints on these topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.