Trial reportObesity surgery2015
Comparison of Rhabdomyolysis Markers in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery with Propofol and Inhalation-based Anesthesia.
Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhalation anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) regimens in patients with obesity: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Article
- Propofol-Related Infusion Syndrome: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited Articles.Cureus · 2023Review
- Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update.World journal of surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRhabdomyolysis is a relatively uncommon, severe complication of anesthesia and surgery in the morbidly obese. As the use of propofol-based anesthesia has been associated with an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis and metabolic acidosis, this pilot study was designed to assess the effect of propofol anesthesia on the incidence of rhabdomyolysis in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
methodsThirty, morbidly obese patients (body mass index 43 ± 3 kg/m(2)) scheduled for bariatric laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were randomized to receive either propofol (P) or inhalational anesthetic (I)-based balanced general anesthesia. A sample of venous blood gas analysis including pH, bicarbonate concentrations, and calculated base excess was taken at the end of the operation. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK), troponin I, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine plasma concentrations were measured at the end of the surgery and again 24 h later.
resultsAll patients enrolled to the study completed it without significant complications. CPK, troponin I, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine plasma concentrations at the end of the operation and at 24 h, as well as the bicarbonate concentration and the base excess at the end of the operation were not significantly different between the two study groups. A statistically significant mild respiratory acidosis was noted in the inhalational anesthetic group (pH 7.30 ± 0.04 vs. 7.36 ± 0.02 in the propofol group)
conclusionsThis small-size pilot study may suggest that propofol-based anesthesia is not related to increased incidence of rhabdomyolysis in morbidly obese patients undergoing short, uncomplicated bariatric surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.