ArticleInsights into imaging2015
Cross-sectional imaging of common and unusual complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging and management of biliary complications after biliary interventions.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Complications and expected imaging findings after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications: risk stratification, prevention, and management.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Portal vein injury following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A case report.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2023Article
- Article
- Gastrointestinal perforation: clinical and MDCT clues for identification of aetiology.Insights into imaging · 2020Article
- Advanced endoscopic interventions on the pancreas and pancreatic ductal system: a primer for radiologists.Insights into imaging · 2019Review
- Early cross-sectional imaging following open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a primer for radiologists.Insights into imaging · 2018Review
- Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: expected post-procedural findings and adverse events.Emergency radiology · 2016Review
- Acute Reversible Duodenitis Following Non-Therapeutic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Is Duodenal Diverticulum a Predisposing Factor?Polish journal of radiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is currently a primarily therapeutic procedure that is extensively employed to treat several biliopancreatic disorders. Although widely considered a safe procedure, ERCP is associated with a non-negligible morbidity and occasional mortality. Due to the number and complexity of operative ERCPs performed, radiologists are increasingly faced with urgent requests for investigation of suspected post-procedural complications, which often have similar clinical and laboratory manifestations. This pictorial essay reviews the usual post-procedural CT findings, the clinical features and imaging appearances of common and unusual post-ERCP occurrences including interstitial oedematous and necrotising acute pancreatitis, haemorrhages, retroperitoneal and intraperitoneal duodenal perforations, infections and stent-related complications. Emphasis is placed on the pivotal role of multidetector CT, which is warranted after complex or prolonged ERCP procedures as it represents the most effective modality to detect and grade ERCP-related complications and to monitor nonsurgically treated patients. Timely diagnosis and optimal management require a combination of clinical and laboratory data with imaging appearances; therefore, this article aims to provide an increased familiarity with interpretation of early post-ERCP studies, particularly to triage those occurrences that require interventional or surgical treatment. In selected patients MRI allows imaging pancreatitis and abnormal collections without the use of ionising radiation. Teaching Points • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) allows treating many biliopancreatic disorders.• Due to the number and complexity of procedures, post-ERCP complications are increasingly encountered.• Main complications include acute pancreatitis, haemorrhages, duodenal perforation and infections.• Diagnosis and management of complications rely on combined clinical, laboratory and imaging data.• Multidetector CT is most effective to diagnose, categorise and monitor post-ERCP complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.