Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25715872›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2015

Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study.

TEAM Study Investigators, Carol Hodgson, Rinaldo Bellomo, Susan Berney, Michael Bailey, Heidi Buhr, Linda Denehy, Megan Harrold, Alisa Higgins, Jeff Presneill and 4 more

7 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01674608 completednot on this map

TEAM: An Multi-centre Observational Study of Early Activity and Mobilization in Australia and New Zealand

TypeobservationalSponsorAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research CentreRan2012 to 2014Enrolled192ConditionsCritically Ill Adults Ventilated >24 Hours in Intensive Care
NCT02478411 naunknown statusnot on this map

Functional and Motor Effects of an Early Cycloergometric Physiotherapy Program in Critically Ill Patients With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Son LlatzerRan2015 to 2021Enrolled68ConditionsWeaknessArmsCycle ergometer physiotherapy, Conventional physiotherapy
NCT03406494 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Southern Medical University Clinical Research Project Initiative:Efficacy and Safety of a Multicomponent Physical Therapy Program in Mechanically Ventilated Patient With Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhujiang HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled800ConditionsSepsisArmsEarly multicomponent physical therapy program
NCT04381338 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Pulmonary and Motor Rehabilitation for People With COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units to Reduce Length of Stay in Hospital

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PadovaRan2020 to 2020Enrolled96ConditionsCorona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19), COVID, Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Critical IllnessArmsPulmonary and Motor Rehabilitation
NCT05298982 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Long-term Evaluation of Disability and Quality of Life at 1,2 and 5 Years in Invasively Mechanically Ventilated Patients Who Received Early Activity and Mobilisation Compared to Standard Care.

TypeobservationalSponsorAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research CentreRan2020 to 2026Enrolled250ConditionsCritically Ill, Mechanical Ventilation, Long Term OutcomeArmsEarly activity and Mobilisation Intervention
NCT05688267 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Continuous Mobility Training in Individuals With Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation : A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaichung Tzu Chi HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled56ConditionsProlonged Mechanical VentilationArmsContinuous Mobility Training, Usual Care
NCT06393829 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of an Early Mobilization Program in Cardiovascular Units

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater MontrealRan2024 to 2026Enrolled350ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsApplying the Early Mobilization Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 350 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

TEAM Study Investigators
Carol Hodgson
Rinaldo Bellomo
Susan Berney
Michael Bailey
Heidi Buhr
Linda Denehy
Megan Harrold
Alisa Higgins
Jeff Presneill
Manoj Saxena
Elizabeth Skinner
Paul Young
Steven Webb

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to investigate current mobilization practice, strength at ICU discharge and functional recovery at 6 months among mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

methodThis was a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study conducted in twelve ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Patients were previously functionally independent and expected to be ventilated for >48 hours. We measured mobilization during invasive ventilation, sedation depth using the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS), co-interventions, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW) at ICU discharge, mortality at day 90, and 6-month functional recovery including return to work.

resultsWe studied 192 patients (mean age 58.1 ± 15.8 years; mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) (IQR) II score, 18.0 (14 to 24)). Mortality at day 90 was 26.6% (51/192). Over 1,351 study days, we collected information during 1,288 planned early mobilization episodes in patients on mechanical ventilation for the first 14 days or until extubation (whichever occurred first). We recorded the highest level of early mobilization. Despite the presence of dedicated physical therapy staff, no mobilization occurred in 1,079 (84%) of these episodes. Where mobilization occurred, the maximum levels of mobilization were exercises in bed (N = 94, 7%), standing at the bed side (N = 11, 0.9%) or walking (N = 26, 2%). On day three, all patients who were mobilized were mechanically ventilated via an endotracheal tube (N = 10), whereas by day five 50% of the patients mobilized were mechanically ventilated via a tracheostomy tube (N = 18).

conclusionsEarly mobilization of patients receiving mechanical ventilation was uncommon. More than 50% of patients discharged from the ICU had developed ICU-acquired weakness, which was associated with death between ICU discharge and day-90. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01674608. Registered 14 August 2012.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialAdultAgedAustraliaCohort StudiesEarly AmbulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID25715872
PMCPMC4342087
OpenAlexW1559156710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.