Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25715853›Full record

ReviewSingapore medical journal2015

Current status of functional gastrointestinal evaluation in clinical practice.

Daphne Ang, Kwong Ming Fock, Ngai Moh Law, Tiing Leong Ang

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Singapore medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daphne AngDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street, Singapore 529889.ang_daphne@yahoo.com.
Kwong Ming Fock
Ngai Moh Law
Tiing Leong Ang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurogastroenterology and motility disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract encompass a broad spectrum of diseases involving the GI tract and central nervous system. They have varied pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management, and make up a substantial proportion of outpatient clinic visits. Typically, patients experience persistent symptoms referable to the GI tract despite normal endoscopic and radiologic findings. An appropriate evaluation is thus important in the patient's care. Advances in technology and understanding of the disease pathophysiology have provided better insight into the physiological basis of disease and a more rational approach to patient management. While technological advances serve to explain patients' persistent symptoms, they should be balanced against the costs of diagnostic tests. This review highlights the GI investigative modalities employed to evaluate patients with persistent GI symptoms in the absence of a structural lesion, with particular emphasis on investigative modalities available locally and the clinical impact of such tools.

Indexed as

ElectrophysiologyEndoscopyEsophagusGastric EmptyingGastroenterologyGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal TractHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIntestine, SmallMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID25715853
PMCPMC4350461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.