Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25715267›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2015

The predictive accuracy of PREDICT: a personalized decision-making tool for Southeast Asian women with breast cancer.

Hoong-Seam Wong, Shridevi Subramaniam, Zarifah Alias, Nur Aishah Taib, Gwo-Fuang Ho, Char-Hong Ng, Cheng-Har Yip, Helena M Verkooijen, Mikael Hartman, Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04985253 (Correlation of Predictive Accuracy of PREDICT Version 2.2,), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04985253 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Correlation of Predictive Accuracy of PREDICT Version 2.2, (PREDICT V2.2) on a Retrospective Cohort of Indian Women With Operable Breast Cancer (OBC)

TypeobservationalSponsorTata Memorial CentreRan2018 to 2022Enrolled2,780ConditionsOperable Breast NeoplasmsArmsprediction of overall survival using Web based PREDICTV2.0 portal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Development of Predictive Models for Survival among Women with Breast Cancer in Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hoong-Seam WongFrom the National Clinical Research Centre (HSW, SS), Level 3, Dermatology Block, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Jalan Pahang; Department of Surgery (ZA, NAT, CHN, CHY); Department of Oncology (GFH), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Imaging Division (HMV), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health (HMV, MH), National University of Singapore; Department of Surgery (MH), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore; Julius Centre University of Malaya (NBP), Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (NBP), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Shridevi Subramaniam
Zarifah Alias
Nur Aishah Taib
Gwo-Fuang Ho
Char-Hong Ng
Cheng-Har Yip
Helena M Verkooijen
Mikael Hartman
Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Web-based prognostication tools may provide a simple and economically feasible option to aid prognostication and selection of chemotherapy in early breast cancers. We validated PREDICT, a free online breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit tool, in a resource-limited setting. All 1480 patients who underwent complete surgical treatment for stages I to III breast cancer from 1998 to 2006 were identified from the prospective breast cancer registry of University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Calibration was evaluated by comparing the model-predicted overall survival (OS) with patients' actual OS. Model discrimination was tested using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 50 years. The median tumor size at presentation was 3 cm and 54% of patients had lymph node-negative disease. About 55% of women had estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Overall, the model-predicted 5 and 10-year OS was 86.3% and 77.5%, respectively, whereas the observed 5 and 10-year OS was 87.6% (difference: -1.3%) and 74.2% (difference: 3.3%), respectively; P values for goodness-of-fit test were 0.18 and 0.12, respectively. The program was accurate in most subgroups of patients, but significantly overestimated survival in patients aged <40 years, and in those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PREDICT performed well in terms of discrimination; areas under ROC curve were 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.81) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.78) for 5 and 10-year OS, respectively. Based on its accurate performance in this study, PREDICT may be clinically useful in prognosticating women with breast cancer and personalizing breast cancer treatment in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultAgedAsian PeopleBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalaysiaMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25715267
PMCPMC4554151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.