Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25714931›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2016

Disease specificity of autoantibodies to cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A in sporadic inclusion body myositis versus known autoimmune diseases.

Megan K Herbert, Judith Stammen-Vogelzangs, Marcel M Verbeek, Anke Rietveld, Ingrid E Lundberg, Hector Chinoy, Janine A Lamb, Robert G Cooper, Mark Roberts, Umesh A Badrising and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Uncovering the significance of expanded CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Megan K HerbertDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences and Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Judith Stammen-VogelzangsDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences and Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marcel M VerbeekDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anke RietveldDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ingrid E LundbergRheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet/Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hector ChinoyCentre for Musculoskeletal Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Janine A LambCentre for Integrated Genomic Medical Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Robert G CooperFaculty of Health & Life Sciences, MRC/ARUK Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mark RobertsSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Umesh A BadrisingDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan L De BleeckerDepartment of Neurology, Neuromuscular Reference Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Pedro M MachadoMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK.
Michael G HannaMRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK.
Lenka PlestilovaDepartment of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri VencovskyDepartment of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-0713
Baziel G van EngelenDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ger J M PruijnDepartment of Biomolecular Chemistry, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences and Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCharles University · CZUniversity College London · GBGhent University Hospital · BEKarolinska University Hospital · SELeiden University Medical Center · NLManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18474Medical Research Council MR/K000608/1Medical Research Council MR/K006312/1Medical Research Council MR/N003322/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe diagnosis of inclusion body myositis (IBM) can be challenging as it can be difficult to clinically distinguish from other forms of myositis, particularly polymyositis (PM). Recent studies have shown frequent presence of autoantibodies directed against cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase 1A (cN-1A) in patients with IBM. We therefore, examined the autoantigenicity and disease specificity of major epitopes of cN-1A in patients with sporadic IBM compared with healthy and disease controls.

methodsSerum samples obtained from patients with IBM (n=238), PM and dermatomyositis (DM) (n=185), other autoimmune diseases (n=246), other neuromuscular diseases (n=93) and healthy controls (n=35) were analysed for the presence of autoantibodies using immunodominant cN-1A peptide ELISAs.

resultsAutoantibodies directed against major epitopes of cN-1A were frequent in patients with IBM (37%) but not in PM, DM or non-autoimmune neuromuscular diseases (<5%). Anti-cN-1A reactivity was also observed in some other autoimmune diseases, particularly Sjögren's syndrome (SjS; 36%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; 20%).

conclusionsIn summary, we found frequent anti-cN-1A autoantibodies in sera from patients with IBM. Heterogeneity in reactivity with the three immunodominant epitopes indicates that serological assays should not be limited to a distinct epitope region. The similar reactivities observed for SjS and SLE demonstrate the need to further investigate whether distinct IBM-specific epitopes exist.

Indexed as

5'-NucleotidaseAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidAutoantibodiesAutoimmune DiseasesCase-Control StudiesDermatomyositisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisMyositis, Inclusion Body5'-NucleotidaseAutoantibodiesNT5C1A protein, humanAutoantibodiesAutoimmune DiseasesDermatomyositisPolymyositis

Identifiers

PMID25714931
PMCPMC4699257
OpenAlexW2161745696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.