Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25714837›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The effect of Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) on Plasmodium falciparum infection in rural and semi-urban communities in the south west region of Cameroon.

Tobias O Apinjoh, Judith K Anchang-Kimbi, Regina N Mugri, Delphine A Tangoh, Robert V Nyingchu, Hanesh F Chi, Rolland B Tata, Charles Njumkeng, Clarisse Njua-Yafi, Eric A Achidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tobias O ApinjohDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Judith K Anchang-KimbiDepartment of Zoology and Animal Physiology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Regina N MugriDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Delphine A TangohDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon; Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Robert V NyingchuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon; Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Hanesh F ChiDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Rolland B TataDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Charles NjumkengDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Clarisse Njua-YafiDepartment of Animal Biology and Physiology, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon.
Eric A AchidiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNs) have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality, but coverage and proper utilization continues to be moderate in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa. The gains made through a nationwide free distribution were explored as well as the effect on malaria prevalence in semi-urban and rural communities in south western Cameroon. A cross sectional survey was conducted between August and December 2013. Information on net possession, status and use were collected using a structured questionnaire while malaria parasitaemia was determined on Giemsa-stained blood smears by light microscopy. ITN ownership increased from 41.9% to 68.1% following the free distribution campaign, with 58.3% (466/799) reportedly sleeping under the net. ITN ownership was lower in rural settings (adjusted OR = 1.93, 95%CI = 1.36-2.74, p<0.001) and at lower altitude (adjusted OR = 1.79, 95%CI = 1.22-2.62, p = 0.003) compared to semi-urban settings and intermediate altitude respectively. Conversely, ITN usage was higher in semi-urban settings (p = 0.002) and at intermediate altitude (p = 0.002) compared with rural localities and low altitude. Malaria parasitaemia prevalence was higher in rural (adjusted OR = 1.63, 95%CI = 1.07-2.49) compared to semi-urban settings and in those below 15 years compared to those 15 years and above. Overall, participants who did not sleep under ITN were more susceptible to malaria parasitaemia (adjusted OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.14-2.54, p = 0.009). Despite the free distribution campaign, ITN ownership and usage, though improved, is still low. As children who reside in rural settings have greater disease burden (parasitemia) than children in semi-urban settings, the potential gains on both reducing inequities in ITN possession as well as disease burden might be substantial if equitable distribution strategies are adopted.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsPlasmodium falciparumRural PopulationSuburban PopulationAdolescentCameroonChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeographyHumansInfantMalaria, FalciparumMaleMosquito Control

Identifiers

PMID25714837
PMCPMC4340618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.