Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25714648›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)2016

Cyclic endogenous estrogen and progesterone vary by mammographic density phenotypes in premenopausal women.

Anita Iversen, Hanne Frydenberg, Anne-Sofie Furberg, Vidar G Flote, Sissi Espetvedt Finstad, Anne McTiernan, Giske Ursin, Tom Wilsgaard, Peter T Ellison, Grazyna Jasienska and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anita IversenaDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway bDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital HF, Ullevål cDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø dThe Norwegian Directorate of Health eCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway fFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington gDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA hDepartment of Environmental Health, Jagiellonian University Collegium Medicum, Krakow, Poland.
Hanne Frydenberg
Anne-Sofie Furberg
Vidar G Flote
Sissi Espetvedt Finstad
Anne McTiernan
Giske Ursin
Tom Wilsgaard
Peter T Ellison
Grazyna Jasienska
Inger Thune

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen and progesterone are key factors in the development of breast cancer, but it remains unclear whether these hormones are associated with mammographic density phenotypes in premenopausal women. We measured percent mammographic density, nondense area, and absolute mammographic density using computer-assisted breast density readings (Madena) from digitized mammograms taken on a scheduled day of the menstrual cycle (day 7-12) among 202 healthy, premenopausal women (Energy Balance and Breast cancer Aspects Study-I). Daily salivary concentrations of 17β-estradiol and progesterone throughout an entire menstrual cycle and fasting morning serum concentrations of hormones on 3 specific days of the menstrual cycle were assessed. Salivary and serum 17β-estradiol and progesterone were positively associated with percent mammographic density, we observed by 1 SD increase in overall salivary estradiol (β-value equal to 2.07, P=0.044), luteal salivary progesterone (β-value equal to 2.40, P=0.020). Women with above-median percent mammographic density had a 20% higher mean salivary 17β-estradiol level throughout the menstrual cycle. The odds ratio for having above-median percent mammographic density (>28.5%) per 1 SD increase in overall salivary 17β-estradiol was 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.13-2.45). Women in the top tertile of the overall average daily 17β-estradiol concentrations had an odds ratio of 2.54 (confidence interval 1.05-6.16) of above-median percent mammographic density compared with women in the bottom tertile. Our finding of a relationship between estrogen, progesterone, and percent mammographic density and not with other mammographic density phenotypes in premenopausal women is biologically plausible, but needs to be replicated in larger studies.

Indexed as

PremenopauseAdultBreastBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsEstrogensFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMammary Glands, HumanMammographyPhenotypeProgesteroneSalivaEstrogensProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID25714648
PMCPMC4885541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.