ArticleAJR. American journal of roentgenology2015
Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors.
Article in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of short-term low-dose tamoxifen on molecular breast imaging background parenchymal uptake: a pilot study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2019Trial
- The Dose-Response Effects of Aerobic Exercise on Body Composition and Breast Tissue among Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2016Trial
- Obesity and metabolic dysfunction correlate with background parenchymal enhancement in premenopausal women.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2023Article
- Background Parenchymal Uptake on Molecular Breast Imaging and Breast Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021Article
- Classification of Background Parenchymal Uptake on Molecular Breast Imaging Using a Convolutional Neural Network.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Article
- Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions.PET clinics · 2018Review
- Quantitative background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging and breast cancer risk: a case-control study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2018Article
- Background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging as a breast cancer risk factor: a case-control study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2016Article
- Sex Differences Research, Precision Medicine, and the Future of Women's Health.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2015Article
- Effect of menstrual cycle phase on background parenchymal uptake at molecular breast imaging.Academic radiology · 2015Article
- Current and Future Methods for Measuring Breast Density: A Brief Comparative Review.Breast cancer management · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to describe the prevalence of background parenchymal uptake categories observed at screening molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to examine the association of background parenchymal uptake with mammographic density and other clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adjunct MBI screening was performed for women with dense breasts on previous mammograms. Two radiologists reviewed images from the MBI examinations and subjectively categorized background parenchymal uptake into four groups: photopenic, minimal-mild, moderate, or marked. Women with breast implants or a personal history of breast cancer were excluded. The association between background parenchymal uptake categories and patient characteristics was examined with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS. In 1149 eligible participants, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 252 (22%), minimal-mild in 728 (63%), and moderate or marked in 169 (15%). The distribution of categories differed across BI-RADS density categories (p < 0.0001). In 164 participants with extremely dense breasts, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 72 (44%), minimal-mild in 55 (34%), and moderate or marked in 37 (22%). The moderate-marked group was younger on average, more likely to be premenopausal or perimenopausal, and more likely to be using postmenopausal hormone therapy than the photopenic or minimal-mild groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Among women with similar-appearing mammographic density, background parenchymal uptake ranged from photopenic to marked. Background parenchymal uptake was associated with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone therapy but not with premenopausal hormonal contraceptives, phase of menstrual cycle, or Gail model 5-year risk of breast cancer. Additional work is necessary to fully characterize the underlying cause of background parenchymal uptake and determine its utility in predicting subsequent risk of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.