Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25714125›Full record

ArticleBioengineered2015

E-nose based rapid prediction of early mouldy grain using probabilistic neural networks.

Xiaoguo Ying, Wei Liu, Guohua Hui, Jun Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineered, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoguo Yinga School of Information Engineering; Key Laboratory of Forestry Intelligent Monitoring and Information Technology of Zhejiang Province; Zhejiang A & F University ; Linan , China.
Wei Liu
Guohua Hui
Jun Fu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, early mouldy grain rapid prediction method using probabilistic neural network (PNN) and electronic nose (e-nose) was studied. E-nose responses to rice, red bean, and oat samples with different qualities were measured and recorded. E-nose data was analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA), back propagation (BP) network, and PNN, respectively. Results indicated that PCA and BP network could not clearly discriminate grain samples with different mouldy status and showed poor predicting accuracy. PNN showed satisfying discriminating abilities to grain samples with an accuracy of 93.75%. E-nose combined with PNN is effective for early mouldy grain prediction.

Indexed as

Electronic NoseModels, StatisticalAvenaBiosensing TechniquesEdible GrainFood AnalysisFungiHumansNeural Networks, ComputerOryzaPhaseolusPrincipal Component AnalysisSensitivity and Specificityearly mouldy grainelectronic nosenon-linearprobabilistic neural networkrapid prediction

Identifiers

PMID25714125
PMCPMC4601313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.