Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25714110›Full record

ReviewVirulence2015

Candida albicans-epithelial interactions and pathogenicity mechanisms: scratching the surface.

David L Moyes, Jonathan P Richardson, Julian R Naglik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virulence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protective effects ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. mBio · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Discovering a new paradigm: Gut microbiota as a central modulator of sexual health.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Quantification methods ofMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2024
    Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David L Moyesa Mucosal & Salivary Biology Division ; King's College London Dental Institute; King's College London ; London , UK.
Jonathan P Richardson
Julian R Naglik

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M011372/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, epithelial cells have been a largely ignored component of host responses to microbes. However, this has been largely overturned over the last decade as an ever increasing number of studies have highlighted the key role that these cells play in many of our interactions with our microbiota and pathogens. Interactions of these cells with Candida albicans have been shown to be critical not just in host responses, but also in fungal cell responses, regulating fungal morphology and gene expression profile. In this review, we will explore the interactions between C. albicans and epithelial cells, and discuss how these interactions affect our relationship with this fungus.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAdhesivenessAnimalsApoptosisCandida albicansCell Adhesion MoleculesEndocytosisEpithelial CellsFungal ProteinsHumansMiceVirulenceALA1 protein, Candida albicansCell Adhesion MoleculesFungal ProteinsadhesionCandida albicansepithelial cellsfungal infectionfungal recognitionhost-pathogen interactioninvasion

Identifiers

PMID25714110
PMCPMC4601190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.