Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713976›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2015

Use of life course work-family profiles to predict mortality risk among US women.

Erika L Sabbath, Ivan Mejía Guevara, M Maria Glymour, Lisa F Berkman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Work-family trajectories and health: A systematic review.Advances in life course research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Association between return-to-work trajectories and depressive symptoms in long-term breast cancer survivors: results from the French CONSTANCES cohort.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika L SabbathErika L. Sabbath is with the School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, and the Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Ivan Mejía Guevara is with the Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University. M. Maria Glymour is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, and the Department of Health and Social Behavior, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Lisa F. Berkman is with the Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University, and the Departments of Health and Social Behavior, Epidemiology, and Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health.
Ivan Mejía Guevara
M Maria Glymour
Lisa F Berkman
Harvard University · US

Funding

Social protection, work and family strain: disadvantage effects in US and EuropeR01AG040248 · NIA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BERKMAN, LISA F · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Quantifying Economic & Health Effects of Psychosocial Workplace ExposuresK01OH010673 · OH · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI SABBATH, ERIKA LEHR · 2014 to 2016
$324k
NIA NIH HHS 5R01AG040248-03NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined relationships between US women's exposure to midlife work-family demands and subsequent mortality risk.

methodsWe used data from women born 1935 to 1956 in the Health and Retirement Study to calculate employment, marital, and parenthood statuses for each age between 16 and 50 years. We used sequence analysis to identify 7 prototypical work-family trajectories. We calculated age-standardized mortality rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality associated with work-family sequences, with adjustment for covariates and potentially explanatory later-life factors.

resultsMarried women staying home with children briefly before reentering the workforce had the lowest mortality rates. In comparison, after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, and education, HRs for mortality were 2.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.58, 2.90) among single nonworking mothers, 1.48 (95% CI = 1.06, 1.98) among single working mothers, and 1.36 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.80) among married nonworking mothers. Adjustment for later-life behavioral and economic factors partially attenuated risks.

conclusionsSequence analysis is a promising exposure assessment tool for life course research. This method permitted identification of certain lifetime work-family profiles associated with mortality risk before age 75 years.

Indexed as

AgedAge DistributionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMortalityRiskSmokingSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesWomen's HealthWork

Identifiers

PMID25713976
PMCPMC4358181
OpenAlexW2156041868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.