Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713970›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of public health2015

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of persons during imprisonment and in the year after release.

Fiona G Kouyoumdjian, Kathryn E McIsaac, Jessica Liauw, Samantha Green, Fareen Karachiwalla, Winnie Siu, Kaite Burkholder, Ingrid Binswanger, Lori Kiefer, Stuart A Kinner and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Psychiatric disorders and mental health care among incarcerated men: A prerelease cross-sectional study in France.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fiona G KouyoumdjianFiona G. Kouyoumdjian, Kathryn E. McIsaac, Flora I. Matheson, and Stephen W. Hwang are with the Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario. Jessica Liauw is with McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. Samantha Green is with the Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Fareen Karachiwalla, Winnie Siu, Kaite Burkholder, and Lori Kiefer were with the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario. Ingrid Binswanger is with the School of Medicine and Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado, Aurora and Denver. Stuart A. Kinner is with the School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia. Mo Korchinski and Pam Young are with the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Kathryn E McIsaac
Jessica Liauw
Samantha Green
Fareen Karachiwalla
Winnie Siu
Kaite Burkholder
Ingrid Binswanger
Lori Kiefer
Stuart A Kinner
Mo Korchinski
Flora I Matheson
Pam Young
Stephen W Hwang

Funding

CIHR 127327-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of interventions to improve the health of people during imprisonment or in the year after release. We searched 14 biomedical and social science databases in 2014, and identified 95 studies. Most studies involved only men or a majority of men (70/83 studies in which gender was specified); only 16 studies focused on adolescents. Most studies were conducted in the United States (n = 57). The risk of bias for outcomes in almost all studies was unclear or high (n = 91). In 59 studies, interventions led to improved mental health, substance use, infectious diseases, or health service utilization outcomes; in 42 of these studies, outcomes were measured in the community after release. Improving the health of people who experience imprisonment requires knowledge generation and knowledge translation, including implementation of effective interventions.

Indexed as

Health StatusMental HealthPrisonersCommunicable DiseasesHealth PromotionHealth ServicesHumansMental DisordersPublic HealthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID25713970
PMCPMC4358164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.