ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1989
Comparison of the prejunctional beta-adrenoceptor stimulating actions of adrenaline and isoprenaline in the dog mesenteric vein.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opposite modulation of cotransmitter release in guinea-pig vas deferens: increase of noradrenaline and decrease of ATP release by activation of prejunctional beta-adrenoceptors.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 1996Article
- Actions of dipyridamole on endogenous and exogenous noradrenaline in the dog mesenteric vein.British journal of pharmacology · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The prejunctional beta-adrenoceptor stimulating actions of adrenaline and isoprenaline were compared by recording junction potentials from smooth muscle cells of the dog mesenteric vein. 2. The potency of adrenaline and isoprenaline on beta-adrenoceptors in the postjunctional membrane was estimated from hyperpolarization of the membrane in smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig facial vein. In the presence of yohimbine, both agents hyperpolarized the membrane to a similar extent. 3. In the dog mesenteric vein, amplitude of the excitatory junction potential (e.j.p.) and slow depolarization was inhibited by adrenaline and potentiated by isoprenaline; the former but not the latter was accompanied by depolarization of the smooth muscle membrane. 4. In the presence of yohimbine, adrenaline inhibited the e.j.p. without depolarization of the smooth muscle membrane; the action was weaker than in the absence of yohimbine. The isoprenaline-induced potentiation of the e.j.p. was further enhanced by yohimbine. 5. It is concluded that adrenaline and isoprenaline have similar stimulating actions on postjunctional beta-adrenoceptors in the guinea-pig facial vein, but have different actions on prejunctional beta-adrenoceptors in the dog mesenteric vein; isoprenaline but not adrenaline stimulates this beta-adrenoceptor to facilitate the release of transmitter substances from perivascular noradrenergic nerves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.