Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713805›Full record

ReviewHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2015

Pancreatic cancer surgery and nutrition management: a review of the current literature.

Cheguevara Afaneh, Deborah Gerszberg, Eoin Slattery, David S Seres, John A Chabot, Michael D Kluger

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02941484 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Early Oral Intake After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Age of ERAS

TypeinterventionalSponsorXuzhou Medical UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled100ConditionsPeriampullary Carcinoma Resectable, PancreaticoduodenectomyArmsearly oral intake, jejunostomy tube feeding (JTF)
NCT05506748 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Association Between Preoperative HALP and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorChitwan Medical CollegeRan2021 to 2022Enrolled22ConditionsHemoglobins, Albumins, Platelets, LymphocytesArmspantients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postoperative nutritional support after pancreaticoduodenectomy in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Nutritional support in pancreatic cancer patients and its effect on nutritional status: an observational regional HPB network study investigating current practice.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Clinical nutrition as part of the treatment pathway of pancreatic cancer patients: an expert consensus.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Detours on the Road to Recovery: What Factors Delay Readiness to Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy (RIOT) After Liver Resection for Malignancy?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheguevara Afaneh1 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA ; 2 Department of Food and Nutrition Management, 3 Department of Medicine (Medical Nutrition), 4 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Deborah Gerszberg1 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA ; 2 Department of Food and Nutrition Management, 3 Department of Medicine (Medical Nutrition), 4 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eoin Slattery1 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA ; 2 Department of Food and Nutrition Management, 3 Department of Medicine (Medical Nutrition), 4 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
David S Seres1 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA ; 2 Department of Food and Nutrition Management, 3 Department of Medicine (Medical Nutrition), 4 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
John A Chabot1 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA ; 2 Department of Food and Nutrition Management, 3 Department of Medicine (Medical Nutrition), 4 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Michael D Kluger1 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA ; 2 Department of Food and Nutrition Management, 3 Department of Medicine (Medical Nutrition), 4 Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery remains the only curative treatment for pancreaticobiliary tumors. These patients typically present in a malnourished state. Various screening tools have been employed to help with preoperative risk stratification. Examples include the subjective global assessment (SGA), malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), and nutritional risk index (NRI). Adequate studies have not been performed to determine if perioperative interventions, based on nutrition risk assessment, result in less morbidity and mortality. The routine use of gastric decompression with nasogastric sump tubes may be unnecessary following elective pancreatic resections. Instead, placement should be selective and employed on a case-by-case basis. A wide variety of feeding modalities are available, oral nutrition being the most effective. Artificial nutrition may be provided by temporary nasal tube (nasogastric, nasojejunal, or combined nasogastrojejunal tube) or surgically placed tube [gastrostomy (GT), jejunostomy (JT), gastrojejunostomy tubes (GJT)], and intravenously (parenteral nutrition, PN). The optimal tube for enteral feeding cannot be determined based on current data. Each is associated with a specific set of complications. Dual lumen tubes may be useful in the presence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) as the stomach may be decompressed while feeds are delivered to the jejunum. However, all feeding tubes placed in the small intestine, except direct jejunostomies, commonly dislodge and retroflex into the stomach. Jejunostomies are associated with less frequent, but more serious complications. These include intestinal torsion and bowel necrosis. PN is associated with septic, metabolic, and access-related complications and should be the feeding strategy of last-resort. Enteral feeds are clearly preferred over parental nutrition. A sound understanding of perioperative nutrition may improve patient outcomes. Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery should undergo multidisciplinary nutrition screening and intervention, and the surgical/oncological team should include nutrition professionals in managing these patients in the perioperative period.

Indexed as

Complicationsenteral feeding tubesnutritionpancreatic cancer surgery

Identifiers

PMID25713805
PMCPMC4318958
OpenAlexW1880405481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.