ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2015
Can oral anticoagulants be stopped safely after a successful atrial fibrillation ablation?
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Case of Atrial Fibrillation and Rapid Ventricular Response in a 22-Year-Old Athlete With Sickle Cell Trait.Cureus · 2025Article
- Healthcare utilization and clinical outcomes after ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with and without insertable cardiac monitoring.Heart rhythm O2 · 2022Article
- Knots to untie: anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic therapy after ablation for atrial fibrillation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Risk of stroke and transient ischaemic attack in patients with a diagnosis of resolved atrial fibrillation: retrospective cohort studies.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Article
- Combined catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and Watchman® left atrial appendage occlusion procedures: Five-year experience.Journal of arrhythmia · 2016Article
- Managing atrial fibrillation in the very elderly patient: challenges and solutions.Vascular health and risk management · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ablations of atrial fibrillation (AF) have become more widely performed, and the strategy about long-term usage of oral anticoagulants (OACs) after catheter ablation is an important issue, especially for patients without obvious evidences of recurrences. The annual rate of thromboembolic (TE) event after catheter ablation was less than 1%. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores could be used to identify patients at the risk of TE events after ablations who should continue OACs regardless of the status of recurrence. Despite the improvement in understanding of AF and advancement of technology in catheter ablation, the long-term successful rates of paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF are around 50% and 30%, respectively. Patients with a high CHADS2 score are at a high risk of recurrence which could continuously occur after the catheter ablation without reaching a plateau. Among the patients with a CHADS2 score of ≥3, 26.9% of the recurrences happened 2 years post catheter ablation. Compared to the episodes of AF before catheter ablation, the AF episodes after ablation procedures are less symptomatic and shorter in duration. Therefore, it may not be safe to stop OACs for patients with a high risk score since the AF episodes are difficult to be detected after ablation procedures, but remain dangerous. In conclusion, the decision about the long-term strategy of OACs should be based on patients' baseline clinical risk scores, such as CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, rather than the status of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.