Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713712›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2015

Low-protein diets in CKD: how can we achieve them? A narrative, pragmatic review.

Giorgina Barbara Piccoli, Federica Neve Vigotti, Filomena Leone, Irene Capizzi, Germana Daidola, Gianfranca Cabiddu, Paolo Avagnina

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The newClinical kidney journal · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giorgina Barbara PiccoliNephrology, Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, S. Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin , Italy.
Federica Neve VigottiNephrology, Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, S. Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin , Italy.
Filomena LeoneDietetics, Surgical Sciences Department, S. Anna Hospital , University of Torino , Turin , Italy.
Irene CapizziNephrology, Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, S. Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin , Italy.
Germana DaidolaNephrology, S. Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin , Italy.
Gianfranca CabidduNephrology, Brotzu hospital, Cagliari , Italy.
Paolo AvagninaClinical Nutrition, Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, S. Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin , Italy.
University of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-protein diets (LPDs) have encountered various fortunes, and several questions remain open. No single study, including the famous Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, was conclusive and even if systematic reviews are in favour of protein restriction, at least in non-diabetic adults, implementation is lagging. LPDs are considered difficult, malnutrition is a threat and compliance is poor. LPDs have been reappraised in this era of reconsideration of dialysis indications and timing. The definition of a normal-adequate protein diet has shifted in the overall population from 1 to 1.2 to 0.8 g/kg/day. Vegan-vegetarian diets are increasingly widespread, thus setting the groundwork for easier integration of moderate protein restriction in Chronic Kidney Disease. There are four main moderately restricted LPDs (0.6 g/kg/day). Two of them require careful planning of quantity and quality of food: a 'traditional' one, with mixed proteins that works on the quantity and quality of food and a vegan one, which integrates grains and legumes. Two further options may be seen as a way to simplify LPDs while being on the safe side for malnutrition: adding supplements of essential amino and keto acids (various doses) allows an easier shift from omnivorous to vegan diets, while protein-free food intake allows for an increase in calories. Very-low-protein diets (vLPDs: 0.3 g/kg/day) combine both approaches and usually require higher doses of supplements. Moderately restricted LPDs may be adapted to virtually any cuisine and should be tailored to the patients' preferences, while vLPDs usually require trained, compliant patients; a broader offer of diet options may lead to more widespread use of LPDs, without competition among the various schemas.

Indexed as

CKDcomplianceketo acids and amino acidslow-protein dietsvery-low-protein diets

Identifiers

PMID25713712
PMCPMC4310428
OpenAlexW2161854838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.