The beneficial impact of vitamin D treatment in CKD patients: what's next?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Native Hypovitaminosis D in CKD Patients: From Experimental Evidence to Clinical Practice.Nutrients · 2019
   Review
2. Stirring the Pot: Can Dietary Modification Alleviate the Burden of CKD?Nutrients · 2017
   Review
3. Phosphate Toxicity in CKD: The Killer among Us.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016
   Review
4. Vitamin D in patients with chronic kidney disease: a position statement of the Working Group "Trace Elements and Mineral Metabolism" of the Italian Society of Nephrology.Journal of nephrology · 2016
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as