Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713557›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2015

Noise Trauma Induced Neural Plasticity Throughout the Auditory System of Mongolian Gerbils: Differences between Tinnitus Developing and Non-Developing Animals.

Konstantin Tziridis, Sönke Ahlf, Marcus Jeschke, Max F K Happel, Frank W Ohl, Holger Schulze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Konstantin TziridisExperimental Otolaryngology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg , Erlangen , Germany.
Sönke AhlfExperimental Otolaryngology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg , Erlangen , Germany.
Marcus JeschkeLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology , Magdeburg , Germany.
Max F K HappelLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology , Magdeburg , Germany ; Institute of Biology, Otto-von-Guericke-University , Magdeburg , Germany.
Frank W OhlLeibniz Institute for Neurobiology , Magdeburg , Germany ; Institute of Biology, Otto-von-Guericke-University , Magdeburg , Germany ; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences , Magdeburg , Germany.
Holger SchulzeExperimental Otolaryngology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg , Erlangen , Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DELeibniz Institute for Neurobiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we describe differences between neural plasticity in auditory cortex (AC) of animals that developed subjective tinnitus (group T) after noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) compared to those that did not [group non-tinnitus (NT)]. To this end, our analysis focuses on the input activity of cortical neurons based on the temporal and spectral analysis of local field potential (LFP) recordings and an in-depth analysis of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in the same animals. In response to NIHL in NT animals we find a significant general reduction in overall cortical activity and spectral power as well as changes in all ABR wave amplitudes as a function of loudness. In contrast, T-animals show no significant change in overall cortical activity as assessed by root mean square analysis of LFP amplitudes, but a specific increase in LFP spectral power and in the amplitude of ABR wave V reflecting activity in the inferior colliculus (IC). Based on these results, we put forward a refined model of tinnitus prevention after NIHL that acts via a top-down global (i.e., frequency-unspecific) inhibition reducing overall neuronal activity in AC and IC, thereby counteracting NIHL-induced bottom-up frequency-specific neuroplasticity suggested in current models of tinnitus development.

Indexed as

ABRauditory brainstemauditory cortexelectrophysiologyLFP

Identifiers

PMID25713557
PMCPMC4322711
OpenAlexW2009775184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.