Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713464›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2015

NG2+ progenitors derived from embryonic stem cells penetrate glial scar and promote axonal outgrowth into white matter after spinal cord injury.

Sudhakar Vadivelu, Todd J Stewart, Yun Qu, Kevin Horn, Su Liu, Qun Li, Jerry Silver, John W McDonald

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gene silencing NMII promotes axonal regeneration against contusive spinal cord injury in rats.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sudhakar VadiveluThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Sudhakar.Vadivelu@cchmc.org.
Todd J StewartThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yun QuThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kevin HornThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Su LiuThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Qun LiThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jerry SilverThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
John W McDonaldThe International Center for Spinal Cord Injury, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at the Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kennedy Krieger Institute · USCase Western Reserve University · USJohns Hopkins University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Survival &differentiation of ESNLCs after transplantP01NS039577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, EUGENE M · 2000 to 2004
$5.3M
FACTORS AFFECTING REGENERATION THRU THE GLIAL SCARR01NS025713 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SILVER, JERRY · 1988 to 2016
$3.1M
Factors Affecting Regeneration Through the Glial ScarR37NS025713 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SILVER, JERRY · 2005 to 2011
$2.7M
OLIGODENDROCYTE DEATH IN CEREBRAL ISCHEMIAR01NS036265 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDBERG, MARK PAUL · 1997 to 2007
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS NS25713NINDS NIH HHS NS36265NINDS NIH HHS NS39577NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS025713NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036265NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS025713
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The glial scar resulting from spinal cord injury is rich in chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG), a formidable barrier to axonal regeneration. We explored the possibility of breaching that barrier by first examining the scar in a functional in vitro model. We found that embryonic stem cell-derived neural lineage cells (ESNLCs) with prominent expression of nerve glial antigen 2 (NG2) survived, passed through an increasingly inhibitory gradient of CSPG, and expressed matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) at the appropriate stage of their development. Outgrowth of axons from ESNLCs followed because the migrating cells sculpted pathways in which CSPG was degraded. The degradative mechanism involved MMP-9 but not MMP-2. To confirm these results in vivo, we transplanted ESNLCs directly into the cavity of a contused spinal cord 9 days after injury. A week later, ESNLCs survived and were expressing both NG2 and MMP-9. Their axons had grown through long distances (>10 mm), although they preferred to traverse white rather than gray matter. These data are consistent with the concept that expression of inhibitory CSPG within the injury scar is an important impediment to regeneration but that NG2+ progenitors derived from ESNLCs can modify the microenvironment to allow axons to grow through the barrier. This beneficial action may be partly due to developmental expression of MMP-9. We conclude that it might eventually be possible to encourage axonal regeneration in the human spinal cord by transplanting ESNLCs or other cells that express NG2.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAntigensAxonsChondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4Chondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansCicatrixEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 9NeurogliaNeuronsProteoglycansSpinal Cord InjuriesWhite MatterAntigensChondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4Chondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansMatrix Metalloproteinase 9MMP9 protein, humanProteoglycansAxonal regenerationCentral nervous systemDifferentiationGliaGlial scarMatrix metalloproteinaseNeural progenitorPlasticitySpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID25713464
PMCPMC4367502
OpenAlexW2022257153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.