Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713189›Full record

ReviewDiabetes2015

Insulin resistance as a physiological defense against metabolic stress: implications for the management of subsets of type 2 diabetes.

Christopher J Nolan, Neil B Ruderman, Steven E Kahn, Oluf Pedersen, Marc Prentki

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
24.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Recent advances ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Food chemistry: X · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Christopher J NolanDepartment of Endocrinology at Canberra Hospital and the Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, Australia christopher.nolan@anu.edu.au.
Neil B RudermanDiabetes Research Unit, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Steven E KahnDivision of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, and University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Oluf PedersenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marc PrentkiCRCHUM and Montreal Diabetes Research Center and Departments of Nutrition and Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Boston University · USCanberra Hospital · AUNovo Nordisk Foundation · DKUniversité de Montréal · CAVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Karin E Bornfeldt · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
SIRT1, Polyphenols, and Endothelial OxidantsP01HL068758 · NHLBI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI RUDERMAN, NEIL B · 2003 to 2013
$14.1M
The AMPK/SIRT1 Partnershipand Its Biological RelevanceR01DK019514 · NIDDK · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HOSP · PI RUDERMAN, NEIL B · 1986 to 2015
$4.9M
Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL068758NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL068758NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIDDK NIH HHS P30-DK017047NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK019514NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK019514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stratifying the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has to take into account marked variability in patient phenotype due to heterogeneity in its pathophysiology, different stages of the disease process, and multiple other patient factors including comorbidities. The focus here is on the very challenging subgroup of patients with T2D who are overweight or obese with insulin resistance (IR) and the most refractory hyperglycemia due to an inability to change lifestyle to reverse positive energy balance. For this subgroup of patients with T2D, we question the dogma that IR is primarily harmful to the body and should be counteracted at any cost. Instead we propose that IR, particularly in this high-risk subgroup, is a defense mechanism that protects critical tissues of the cardiovascular system from nutrient-induced injury. Overriding IR in an effort to lower plasma glucose levels, particularly with intensive insulin therapy, could therefore be harmful. Treatments that nutrient off-load to lower glucose are more likely to be beneficial. The concepts of "IR as an adaptive defense mechanism" and "insulin-induced metabolic stress" may provide explanation for some of the unexpected outcomes of recent major clinical trials in T2D. Potential molecular mechanisms underlying these concepts; their clinical implications for stratification of T2D management, particularly in overweight and obese patients with difficult glycemic control; and future research requirements are discussed.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin ResistanceStress, PhysiologicalHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID25713189
PMCPMC4338588
OpenAlexW2171843668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.