Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25713060›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2015

Challenges and opportunities in developing respiratory syncytial virus therapeutics.

Eric A F Simões, John P DeVincenzo, Michael Boeckh, Louis Bont, James E Crowe, Paul Griffiths, Frederick G Hayden, Richard L Hodinka, Rosalind L Smyth, Keith Spencer and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Eric A F SimõesDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, and Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora.
John P DeVincenzoDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee School of Medicine Children's Foundation Research Institute at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis.
Michael BoeckhFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and University of Washington, Seattle.
Louis BontDepartment of Pediatrics and Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
James E CroweDepartment of Pediatrics and the Vanderbilt Vaccine Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Paul GriffithsCentre for Virology, University College London Medical School.
Frederick G HaydenDepartment of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.
Richard L HodinkaClinical Virology Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rosalind L SmythDepartment of Pediatrics, University College London Institute of Child Health.
Keith SpencerWellcome Trust, Innovations, London.
Steffen ThirstrupNDA Advisory Services Ltd, Leatherhead, United Kingdom Department of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Edward E WalshDepartment of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, Rochester General Hospital, New York.
Richard J WhitleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Microbiology, Medicine and Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
University College London · GBChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USColorado School of Public Health · USLe Bonheur Children's Hospital · USNuclear Decommissioning Authority · GBRochester General Hospital · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Washington · USVanderbilt University · USWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two meetings, one sponsored by the Wellcome Trust in 2012 and the other by the Global Virology Foundation in 2013, assembled academic, public health and pharmaceutical industry experts to assess the challenges and opportunities for developing antivirals for the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections. The practicalities of clinical trials and establishing reliable outcome measures in different target groups were discussed in the context of the regulatory pathways that could accelerate the translation of promising compounds into licensed agents. RSV drug development is hampered by the perceptions of a relatively small and fragmented market that may discourage major pharmaceutical company investment. Conversely, the public health need is far too large for RSV to be designated an orphan or neglected disease. Recent advances in understanding RSV epidemiology, improved point-of-care diagnostics, and identification of candidate antiviral drugs argue that the major obstacles to drug development can and will be overcome. Further progress will depend on studies of disease pathogenesis and knowledge provided from controlled clinical trials of these new therapeutic agents. The use of combinations of inhibitors that have different mechanisms of action may be necessary to increase antiviral potency and reduce the risk of resistance emergence.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalDrug DiscoveryDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRespiratory Syncytial VirusesRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsAntiviral Agentspatient populationsrespiratory syncytial virustherapeutic strategies

Identifiers

PMID25713060
PMCPMC4345819
OpenAlexW2164747081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.