ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Prefabrication of vascularized facial bones].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterotopic bone formation in the musculus latissimus dorsi of sheep using β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds: evaluation of different seeding techniques.Regenerative biomaterials · 2018Article
- The Arteriovenous (AV) Loop in a Small Animal Model to Study Angiogenesis and Vascularized Tissue Engineering.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical size defects in the craniomaxillofacial region often result from ablative tumor surgery, inflammation and posttraumatic deformities. To date, autologous bone grafts are still the gold standard for the reconstruction of these defects; however, they are frequently associated with severe donor site morbidity as well as functional and aesthetic compromises. In this context various resorbable and non-resorbable bone replacement materials have been developed and intensively investigated. Particularly in critical size defects these materials fail due to their lack of osteogenic potential and endogenous vascularization. The combination of alloplastic osteoconductive scaffolds, osteogenic cells, and axial prevascularization in bioartificial bone grafts might present an innovative approach for the microsurgical reconstruction of critical size defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25712784What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.