ReviewHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2015
Gained in translation: protective paradigms for the poststenotic kidney.
Review in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peristenotic Collateral Circulation in Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: Association With Kidney Function and Response to Treatment.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2020Article
- Comparison of the Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Their Extracellular Vesicles on the Treatment of Kidney Damage Induced by Chronic Renal Artery Stenosis.Stem cells international · 2020Article
- Improved renal outcomes after revascularization of the stenotic renal artery in pigs by prior treatment with low-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy.Journal of hypertension · 2019Article
- Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: Should we Intervene Earlier?Current hypertension reports · 2018Review
- Renal Arterial Disease and Hypertension.The Medical clinics of North America · 2017Review
- Renal artery stenosis: if and when to intervene.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.