Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25712716›Full record

ArticleProteins2015

Protein models docking benchmark 2.

Ivan Anishchenko, Petras J Kundrotas, Alexander V Tuzikov, Ilya A Vakser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Challenges in structural approaches to cell modeling.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivan AnishchenkoCenter for Bioinformatics, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047; United Institute of Informatics Problems, National Academy of Sciences, Minsk, 220012, Belarus.
Petras J Kundrotas
Alexander V Tuzikov
Ilya A Vakser

Funding

Integrated Resource for Protein Recognition StudiesR01GM074255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI VAKSER, ILYA · 2005 to 2024
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074255NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM074255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural characterization of protein-protein interactions is essential for our ability to understand life processes. However, only a fraction of known proteins have experimentally determined structures. Such structures provide templates for modeling of a large part of the proteome, where individual proteins can be docked by template-free or template-based techniques. Still, the sensitivity of the docking methods to the inherent inaccuracies of protein models, as opposed to the experimentally determined high-resolution structures, remains largely untested, primarily due to the absence of appropriate benchmark set(s). Structures in such a set should have predefined inaccuracy levels and, at the same time, resemble actual protein models in terms of structural motifs/packing. The set should also be large enough to ensure statistical reliability of the benchmarking results. We present a major update of the previously developed benchmark set of protein models. For each interactor, six models were generated with the model-to-native C(α) RMSD in the 1 to 6 Å range. The models in the set were generated by a new approach, which corresponds to the actual modeling of new protein structures in the "real case scenario," as opposed to the previous set, where a significant number of structures were model-like only. In addition, the larger number of complexes (165 vs. 63 in the previous set) increases the statistical reliability of the benchmarking. We estimated the highest accuracy of the predicted complexes (according to CAPRI criteria), which can be attained using the benchmark structures. The set is available at http://dockground.bioinformatics.ku.edu.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Sequence DataProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryReference StandardsProteinsmodeling of protein complexesprotein interactionsprotein modelingprotein recognitionstructure prediction

Identifiers

PMID25712716
PMCPMC4400263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.