Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25712381›Full record

ArticleJIMD reports2015

Assessing Psychological Functioning in Metabolic Disorders: Validation of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Second Edition (ABAS-II), and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) for Identification of Individuals at Risk.

Susan E Waisbren, Jianping He, Robert McCarter

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JIMD reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00237315 unknown statusnot on this map

Longitudinal Study of Urea Cycle Disorders

TypeobservationalSponsorAndrea GropmanRan2006 to 2026Enrolled1,500ConditionsBrain Diseases, Metabolic, Inborn, Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Urea Cycle Disorders
NCT02935283 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Neuroimaging and Neuropsychological Outcomes in Urea Cycle Disorders

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's National Research InstituteRan2016 to 2025Enrolled56ConditionsUrea Cycle DisordersArmsMRI, Behavioral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan E WaisbrenBoston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1 Autumn Street #525, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, Susan.waisbren@childrens.harvard.edu.
Jianping He
Robert McCarter
Boston Children's Hospital · USChildren's National · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

HARVARD CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER (UL1)UL1RR025758 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2008 to 2011
$91.4M
Training (Career Development) ComponentU54HD061221 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NAGAMANI, SANDESH CHAKRAVARTHY SREENATH · 2009 to 2023
$20.8M
NEUROIMAGING COREP30HD040677 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VITTORIO GALLO, VITTORIO GALLO VITTORIO GALLO · 2001 to 2015
$15.9M
Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's NationalUL1TR000075 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$13.7M
RARE DISEASES CRC: UREA CYCLE DISORDERSU54RR019453 · NCRR · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BATSHAW, MARK L. · 2003 to 2008
$7.0M
Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children's NationalKL2TR000076 · NCATS · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GUAY-WOODFORD, LISA MARIE · 2012 to 2014
$756k
Propranolol vs Prednisolone for Infant Hemangiomas-A Clinical and Molecular StudyR21HD062959 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BAUMAN, NANCY MARIE · 2010 to 2011
$467k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000076NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000075NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR019453NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025758NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD040677NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD062959NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD061221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term follow-up of neuropsychological functioning in metabolic disorders remains difficult due to limited opportunities for comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. This study examined the validity of using the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Second Edition (ABAS-II), and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) for assessing developmental status in metabolic disorders and for identifying individuals at risk for cognitive deficits. Results from individuals with urea cycle disorders, phenylketonuria, galactosemia, and fatty acid oxidation disorders were obtained on the ABAS-II and BRIEF and were compared to results obtained from neuropsychological testing performed on the same day. Correlations between scores on the ABAS-II and developmental or IQ tests for individuals with urea cycle disorders ranged from 0.48 to 0.72 and concordance rates for scores greater than a standard deviation below the normative mean ranged from 69 to 89%. Correlations ranged from 0.20 to 0.68 with concordance ranging from 73 to 90% in the other metabolic disorders. For the BRIEF, correlations with other tests of executive functioning were significant for urea cycle disorders, with concordance ranging from 52 to 80%. For the other metabolic disorders, correlations ranged from -0.09 to -0.55. Concordance rates for at-risk status on the BRIEF and executive functioning tests ranged from 55% in adults to 80% in children with other metabolic disorders. These results indicate that the ABAS-II and BRIEF together can confidently be used as an adjunct or supplementary method for clinical follow-up and for research on functional status involving infants, children, and adults with metabolic disorders.

Identifiers

PMID25712381
PMCPMC4470946
OpenAlexW1519806813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.