Trial reportWorld journal of urology2015
Open-label, 9-month extension study investigating the uro-selective alpha-blocker silodosin in men with LUTS associated with BPH.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Review
- Evolving Role of Silodosin for the Treatment of Urological Disorders - A Narrative Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Review
- Evaluation of apoptosis indexes in currently used oral alpha-blockers in prostate: a pilot study.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the long-term safety (primary objective) and efficacy/impact on quality of life (QoL, secondary objectives) of silodosin 8 mg once daily in men with LUTS/BPH. PATIENTS AND
methodsMen who completed the 12-week double-blind study with silodosin 8 mg, tamsulosin 0.4 mg, or placebo were offered to continue with the 9-month open-label study during which all patients received silodosin 8 mg once daily. Safety was assessed by analysing vital signs, electrocardiograms, laboratory tests, and adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS voiding and storage sub-scores, IPSS-QoL, and maximum urinary flow rate (Q max).
resultsA total of 500 patients (mean age 66 years) entered the 9-month open-label study. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were experienced by 33.4% patients. Ejaculation dysfunction was the most common TEAE (9.0%) but led to study discontinuations in only 1.6% of patients. Dizziness without orthostatic hypotension occurred in 0.8%. A marked reduction in total IPSS (-2.7 ± 3.8) was documented at the first visit of this extension phase in patients having de novo silodosin compared with lesser improvement in patients previously treated with silodosin (-0.82 ± 4.2) or tamsulosin (-0.83 ± 3.8). Improvements were maintained throughout the open-label phase. QoL also improved, with the greatest improvement in de novo silodosin patients. No relevant changes in Q max occurred.
conclusionsLong-term treatment with silodosin was safe and efficacious. Abnormal ejaculation was the most common TEAE, but led to treatment discontinuation in only 1.6% of patients. Orthostatic hypotension was not seen, and only a few patients experienced dizziness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.