ArticleHeredity2015
A molecular perspective on a complex polymorphic inversion system with cytological evidence of multiply reused breakpoints.
Article in Heredity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosomal Inversions in Chromosome U ofInsects · 2025Article
- The origin and maintenance of supergenes contributing to ecological adaptation in Atlantic herring.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Population History Shapes Responses to Different Temperature Regimes inLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fine-Scale Position Effects Shape the Distribution of Inversion Breakpoints in Drosophila melanogaster.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- The Cyclically SeasonalFrontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- The molecular genealogy of sequential overlapping inversions implies both homologous chromosomes of a heterokaryotype in an inversion origin.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
- The molecular characterization of fixed inversions breakpoints unveils the ancestral character of the Drosophila guanche chromosomal arrangements.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Inversion evolutionary rates might limit the experimental identification of inversion breakpoints in non-model species.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- An easy route to the massive karyotyping of complex chromosomal arrangements in Drosophila.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Dense gene physical maps of the non-model species Drosophila subobscura.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017Article
- Core-genome scaffold comparison reveals the prevalence that inversion events are associated with pairs of inverted repeats.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Multiple and diverse structural changes affect the breakpoint regions of polymorphic inversions across the Drosophila genus.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- The origin of chromosomal inversions as a source of segmental duplications in the Sophophora subgenus of Drosophila.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome sequence comparison across the Drosophila genus revealed that some fixed inversion breakpoints had been multiply reused at this long timescale. Cytological studies of Drosophila inversion polymorphism had previously shown that, also at this shorter timescale, some breakpoints had been multiply reused. The paucity of molecularly characterized polymorphic inversion breakpoints has so far precluded contrasting whether cytologically shared breakpoints of these relatively young inversions are actually reused at the molecular level. The E chromosome of Drosophila subobscura stands out because it presents several inversion complexes. This is the case of the E1+2+9+3 arrangement that originated from the ancestral Est arrangement through the sequential accumulation of four inversions (E1, E2, E9 and E3) sharing some breakpoints. We recently identified the breakpoints of inversions E1 and E2, which allowed establishing reuse at the molecular level of the cytologically shared breakpoint of these inversions. Here, we identified and sequenced the breakpoints of inversions E9 and E3, because they share breakpoints at sections 58D and 64C with those of inversions E1 and E2. This has allowed establishing that E9 and E3 originated through the staggered-break mechanism. Most importantly, sequence comparison has revealed the multiple reuse at the molecular level of the proximal breakpoint (section 58D), which would have been used at least by inversions E2, E9 and E3. In contrast, the distal breakpoint (section 64C) might have been only reused once by inversions E1 and E2, because the distal E3 breakpoint is displaced >70 kb from the other breakpoint limits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.