Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25712190›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenomics2015

In vitro human cell line models to predict clinical response to anticancer drugs.

Nifang Niu, Liewei Wang

Abstract readReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Cell Immortality:Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nifang NiuDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Liewei Wang

Funding

Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Drug Metabolizing EnzymesU19GM061388 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WEINSHILBOUM, RICHARD M. · 2010 to 2014
$15.8M
Pharmacogenomics and Mechanisms of Cytidine AnaloguesR01CA138461 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WANG, LIEWEI · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138461NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM061388NIGMS NIH HHS U19 GM61388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro human cell line models have been widely used for cancer pharmacogenomic studies to predict clinical response, to help generate pharmacogenomic hypothesis for further testing, and to help identify novel mechanisms associated with variation in drug response. Among cell line model systems, immortalized cell lines such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) have been used most often to test the effect of germline genetic variation on drug efficacy and toxicity. Another model, especially in cancer research, uses cancer cell lines such as the NCI-60 panel. These models have been used mainly to determine the effect of somatic alterations on response to anticancer therapy. Even though these cell line model systems are very useful for initial screening, results from integrated analyses of multiple omics data and drug response phenotypes using cell line model systems still need to be confirmed by functional validation and mechanistic studies, as well as validation studies using clinical samples. Future models might include the use of patient-specific inducible pluripotent stem cells and the incorporation of 3D culture which could further optimize in vitro cell line models to improve their predictive validity.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TransformedCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationHapMap ProjectHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsIn Vitro TechniquesModels, BiologicalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAntineoplastic AgentsGenetic Markersanticancer therapycancer cell line collectionsdrug responsein vitro human cell line modelslymphoblastoid cell linesNCI-60 panelpharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID25712190
PMCPMC4358765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.