Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25712143›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2015

An abnormality in glucocorticoid receptor expression differentiates steroid responders from nonresponders in keloid disease.

D Rutkowski, F Syed, L C Matthews, D W Ray, D A McGrouther, R E B Watson, A Bayat

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Research advances in the treatment of keloid with glucocorticoids].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in keloid.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D RutkowskiInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
F SyedInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
L C MatthewsManchester Centre for Nuclear Hormone Research in Disease, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
D W RayManchester Centre for Nuclear Hormone Research in Disease, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
D A McGroutherInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
R E B WatsonInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
A BayatInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L006499/1Medical Research Council MR/M008908/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlucocorticoids (GCs) are first-line treatment for keloid disease (KD) but are limited by high incidence of resistance, recurrence and undesirable side-effects. Identifying patient responsiveness early could guide therapy.

methodsNineteen patients with KD were recruited at week 0 (before treatment) and received intralesional steroids. At weeks 0, 2 and 4, noninvasive imaging and biopsies were performed. Responsiveness was determined by clinical response and a significant reduction in vascular perfusion following steroid treatment, using full-field laser perfusion imaging (FLPI). Responsiveness was also evaluated using (i) spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis to quantify changes in collagen and melanin and (ii) histology to identify changes in epidermal thickness and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) expression. Biopsies were used to quantify changes in glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry.

resultsAt week 2, the FLPI was used to separate patients into steroid responsive (n = 12) and nonresponsive groups (n = 7). All patients demonstrated a significant decrease in GAG at week 2 (P < 0.05). At week 4, responsive patients exhibited significant reduction in melanin, GAG, epidermal thickness (all P < 0.05) and a continued reduction in perfusion (P < 0.001) compared with nonresponders. Steroid-responsive patients had increased GR expression at baseline and showed autoregulation of GR compared with nonresponders, who showed no change in GR transcription or protein.

conclusionsThis is the first demonstration that keloid response to steroids can be measured objectively using noninvasive imaging. FLPI is a potentially reliable tool to stratify KD responsiveness. Altered GR expression may be the mechanism gating therapeutic response.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceCicatrixFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKeloidMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, GlucocorticoidReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSteroidsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultReceptors, GlucocorticoidSteroids

Identifiers

PMID25712143
PMCPMC4744777
OpenAlexW1996618368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.