Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25711955›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2015

The effect of breakfast type and frequency of consumption on glycemic response in overweight/obese late adolescent girls.

A Y Alwattar, J P Thyfault, H J Leidy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05000944 (Impact of Breakfast Consumption Timing on Postprandial Glycaemia and Insulinaemia in Adolescent Girls Who Habitually Skip Breakfast), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05000944 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Breakfast Consumption Timing on Postprandial Glycaemia and Insulinaemia in Adolescent Girls Who Habitually Skip Breakfast

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoughborough UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled15ConditionsPostprandial HyperglycemiaArmsbreakfast omission (BO), early-morning breakfast consumption (EM-BC), mid-morning breakfast consumption (MM-BC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of breakfast consumption timingThe British journal of nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Frequency of Breakfast Eating and Obesity Prevalence in Primary School Teachers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Y AlwattarDepartment of Nutrition & Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
J P Thyfault1] Department of Nutrition & Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA [2] Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
H J LeidyDepartment of Nutrition & Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe primary aim was to examine the daily glycemic response to normal-protein (NP) vs higher-protein (HP) breakfasts in overweight adolescents who habitually skip breakfast (H-BS). The secondary aim examined whether the glycemic response to these meals differed in H-BS vs habitual breakfast consumers (H-BC). SUBJECTS/

methodsThirty-five girls (age: 19 ± 1 year; body mass index: 28.4 ± 0.7 kg/m(2)) participated in the semi-randomized crossover-design study. The participants were grouped according to habitual breakfast frequency. H-BS (n = 20) continued to skip breakfast (BS) or consumed a NP (12 g protein) or HP (32 g protein) breakfast for 3 days, whereas the H-BC (n = 15) completed the NP and HP breakfast conditions for 3 days. On day 4 of each pattern, an 8 h testing day was completed. The respective breakfast and a standard lunch meal were provided, and plasma was collected to assess morning, afternoon, and total glucose and insulin area under the curves (AUC).

resultsIn H-BS, the addition of a HP breakfast increased total glucose AUC vs BS (P < 0.05), whereas NP breakfast increased total insulin AUC vs BS (P < 0.05). In H-BC, the HP breakfast reduced morning, afternoon and total glucose AUCs vs NP (all, P < 0.05). No differences in insulin were detected. When comparing the HP-NP differential glycemic responses between groups, H-BS experienced greater afternoon and total glucose AUCs following HP vs NP breakfasts (both, P<0.05). No differences in insulin responses were observed between groups.

conclusionsNovel differences in the glucose response to HP vs NP breakfasts were observed and were influenced by the frequency of habitual breakfast consumption in overweight adolescents.

Indexed as

AdolescentArea Under CurveBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBreakfastCross-Over StudiesDietary ProteinsFemaleHumansInsulinOverweightPostprandial PeriodTime FactorsYoung AdultBlood GlucoseDietary ProteinsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID25711955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.