Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2015
The effect of C-reactive protein reduction with a highly specific antisense oligonucleotide on atrial fibrillation assessed using beat-to-beat pacemaker Holter follow-up.
Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention C-Reactive Protein Levels and In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Non-coding RNA therapeutics in cardiovascular diseases and risk factors: Systematic review.Non-coding RNA research · 2023Review
- Review
- Monomeric C-Reactive Protein in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Advances and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- C-reactive protein: a target for therapy to reduce inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- IL-6 Rapidly Induces Reversible Atrial Electrical Remodeling by Downregulation of Cardiac Connexins.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Immunopathogenesis and biomarkers of recurrent atrial fibrillation following ablation therapy in patients with preexisting atrial fibrillation.Expert review of cardiovascular therapy · 2019Review
- RNA Therapeutics in Cardiovascular Precision Medicine.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- Silencing of Foxp3 enhances the antitumor efficacy of GM-CSF genetically modified tumor cell vaccine against B16 melanoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeC-reactive protein (CRP) is known to be strongly associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is not clear if CRP is a causal factor for AF. ISIS-CRPRx is a novel antisense oligonucleotide that reduces CRP production by specifically inhibiting mRNA translation. The effect of ISIS-CRPRx on AF was evaluated.
methodsA double-blind phase II trial of ISIS-CRPRx in patients with paroxysmal AF and DDDRP permanent pacemakers (PPMs) with advanced atrial and ventricular Holters allowing beat-to-beat arrhythmia follow-up.
resultsTwenty six patients were screened and seven patients dosed with ISIS-CRPRx. After 4 weeks of baseline assessment, patients were randomly assigned to two treatment periods of either placebo then ISIS-CRPRx or ISIS-CRPRx then placebo. All patients were followed up for 8 weeks after the active treatment period. There was a 63.7 % (95 % CI 38.4 to 78.6 %, p = 0.003) relative reduction in CRP on treatment with ISIS-CRPRx versus baseline. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a consistent treatment effect. The primary end-point was change in AF burden assessed by PPM. There was no significant difference in AF burden on treatment with ISIS-CRPRx versus baseline (OR 1.6, 95 % CI -2.42 to 5.62, p = 0.37). ISIS CRPRx was safe and well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events.
conclusionsTreatment with ISIS-CRPRx did not reduce AF burden in patients with paroxysmal AF and PPMs, despite a large relative reduction in CRP. In this population, highly specific CRP reduction had no clinically discernable effect upon paroxysmal AF. However, average levels of CRP at baseline were relatively low, so it remains possible that AF patients with higher levels of CRP may benefit from CRP-directed therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.