Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25711859›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2015

Evolution of Tibetan wild boars.

Laurent A F Frantz, Ole Madsen, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Joshua G Schraiber, Yogesh Paudel, Mirte Bosse, Richard P M A Crooijmans, Greger Larson, Martien A M Groenen

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phylogenetic Relations and High-Altitude Adaptation in Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  3. Swine global genomic resources: insights into wild and domesticated populations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Distinct Patterns ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurent A F Frantz1] Animal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. [2] Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ole MadsenAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Hendrik-Jan MegensAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Joshua G Schraiber1] Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA. [2] Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Yogesh PaudelAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Mirte BosseAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Richard P M A CrooijmansAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Greger Larson1] Durham Evolution and Ancient DNA, Department of Archaeology, Durham University, Durham, UK. [2] Palaeogenomics and Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Martien A M GroenenAnimal Breeding and Genomics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000000304844545

Funding

European Research Council 249894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnimalsFemaleSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID25711859
PMCPMC4455000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.