Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25711832›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2015

A survey of imprinted gene expression in mouse trophoblast stem cells.

J Mauro Calabrese, Joshua Starmer, Megan D Schertzer, Della Yee, Terry Magnuson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. eLife · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Mauro CalabreseDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 jmcalabr@med.unc.edu terry_magnuson@med.unc.edu.
Joshua StarmerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Megan D SchertzerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Della YeeLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Terry MagnusonLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 jmcalabr@med.unc.edu terry_magnuson@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Integrated Training in Cancer Model SystemsT32CA009156 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DER, CHANNING J. · 1985 to 2020
$19.7M
Albino Deletion Complex and Early Mouse DevelopmentR01GM101974 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MAGNUSON, TERRY R · 2012 to 2024
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several hundred mammalian genes are expressed preferentially from one parental allele as the result of a process called genomic imprinting. Genomic imprinting is prevalent in extra-embryonic tissue, where it plays an essential role during development. Here, we profiled imprinted gene expression via RNA-Seq in a panel of six mouse trophoblast stem lines, which are ex vivo derivatives of a progenitor population that gives rise to the placental tissue of the mouse. We found evidence of imprinted expression for 48 genes, 31 of which had been described previously as imprinted and 17 of which we suggest as candidate imprinted genes. An equal number of maternally and paternally biased genes were detected. On average, candidate imprinted genes were more lowly expressed and had weaker parent-of-origin biases than known imprinted genes. Several known and candidate imprinted genes showed variability in parent-of-origin expression bias between the six trophoblast stem cell lines. Sixteen of the 48 known and candidate imprinted genes were previously or newly annotated noncoding RNAs and six encoded for a total of 60 annotated microRNAs. Pyrosequencing across our panel of trophoblast stem cell lines returned levels of imprinted expression that were concordant with RNA-Seq measurements for all eight genes examined. Our results solidify trophoblast stem cells as a cell culture-based experimental model to study genomic imprinting, and provide a quantitative foundation upon which to delineate mechanisms by which the process is maintained in the mouse.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionGenomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMiceMicroRNAsReproducibility of ResultsRNA, UntranslatedStem CellsTrophoblastsMicroRNAsRNA, UntranslatedepigeneticsimprintingmicroRNAsnoncoding RNAtrophoblast

Identifiers

PMID25711832
PMCPMC4426363
OpenAlexW2153301039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.