ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2015
Oral bacteria adherence to suture threads: an in vitro study.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-genome amplification as a tool to improve bacterial detection by PCR in microbiological samples after endodontic treatment.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Comparison of the number of bacterial colonies among four types of suture threads using simple loop method following periodontal surgery in patients with periodontitis: A single-blind randomized clinical trial.Dental research journal · 2023Article
- Use of MALDI-TOF MS to Discriminate between Biofilm-Producer and Non-Producer Strains ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the adherence of oral microorganisms to different types of suture threads.
methodsPieces of thread were distributed on 24-well plates, according to the following groups: (G1) nylon, (G2) silk, (G3) polyglactin 910, (G4) polyglactin 910 with triclosan. Blank control (G5) consisted of one thread from each group. Adherence to thread tests was performed to observe adhesion of total microorganisms from saliva or two isolates of Prevotella intermedia (ATCC49046) and Fusobacterium nucleatum (ATCC51190). Brain-heart infusion (BHI) medium with or without bacterial inoculum (1.8 × 10(7) CFU/mL) was added to each well of microplates. The microplates were incubated in an anaerobic chamber at 37 °C, for 5 days for biofilm formation.
resultsThere was no difference between the groups as regard to adhesion of F. nucleatum (p > 0.05). For P. intermedia, the threads in G1 and G4 showed a lower level of adhesion (p < 0.05), with no difference between them. Against total microorganisms, G1 presented a lower level of adherence (p < 0.05), followed by G4; and no difference was observed between G2 and G3.
conclusionsTotal microorganisms and P. intermedia have different affinities to the tested suture threads, whereas F. nucleatum presented a similar adherence level. Among the threads, nylon (G1), followed by polyglactin 910 with triclosan (G4) presented the lowest microbial adherence level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25711725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.