Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25711512›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015

Carbon nanopipette electrodes for dopamine detection in Drosophila.

Hillary R Rees, Sean E Anderson, Eve Privman, Haim H Bau, B Jill Venton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Construction of a Au@MoSRSC advances · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanoelectrochemistry in the study of single-cell signaling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Electrochemistry at the Synapse.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hillary R Rees
Sean E Anderson§Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Eve Privman
Haim H Bau§Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
B Jill Venton
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007267 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI GARCIA-BLANCO, MARIANO A. · 1985 to 2024
$13.4M
Real-Time Measurements of Neurotransmission in Drosphilia melanogasterR01MH085159 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI B. JILL VENTON · 2009 to 2026
$5.9M
Mechanisms of Neuro-AIDS by HIV 1B and C CladesR01MH085259 · NIMH · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI NAIR, MADHAVAN P. · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Carbon Nanopipe-Based Automated Cell Injection SystemR21EB016343 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BAU, HAIM H · 2014 to 2015
$427k
Carbon nanotube fiber and yarn microelectrodes for high temporal resolution measuR21DA037584 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI VENTON, B. JILL · 2014 to 2015
$413k
NIBIB NIH HHS 1R21EB016343-01NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB016343NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037584NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085159NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085259NIMH NIH HHS R01MH085259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small, robust, sensitive electrodes are desired for in vivo neurotransmitter measurements. Carbon nanopipettes have been previously manufactured and used for single-cell drug delivery and electrophysiological measurements. Here, a modified fabrication procedure was developed to produce batches of solid carbon nanopipette electrodes (CNPEs) with ∼250 nm diameter tips, and controllable lengths of exposed carbon, ranging from 5 to 175 μm. The electrochemical properties of CNPEs were characterized with fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) for the first time. CNPEs were used to detect the electroactive neurotransmitters dopamine, serotonin, and octopamine. CNPEs were significantly more sensitive for serotonin detection than traditional carbon-fiber microelectrodes (CFMEs). Similar to CFMEs, CNPEs have a linear response for dopamine concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10 μM and a limit of detection of 25 ± 5 nM. Recordings with CNPEs were stable for over 3 h when the applied triangle waveform was scanned between -0.4 and +1.3 V vs Ag/AgCl/Cl(-) at 400 V/s. CNPEs were used to detect endogenous dopamine release in Drosophila larvae using optogenetics, which verified the utility of CNPEs for in vivo neuroscience studies. CNPEs are advantageous because they are 1 order of magnitude smaller in diameter than typical CFMEs and have a sharp, tunable geometry that facilitates penetration and implantation for localized measurements in distinct regions of small organisms, such as the Drosophila brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbonDopamineDrosophila melanogasterElectrodesNanoparticlesCarbonDopamine

Identifiers

PMID25711512
PMCPMC4400659
OpenAlexW2318958788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.